@jinalfoflia - OsmCha, while useful, doesn’t actual do what is requested here, does it - “identify changesets where street names were inserted”?

Yes, at this point the filter identifies all the objects whose name tags are changed, but @SomeoneElse - one can write a compare function https://github.com/mapbox/osm-compare to detect a street with a new name, and then we can flag those changesets in osmcha.

naoliv I’d suggest the same tool as andygol suggested. Here’s how you can filter changesets using OSMCHA.

It also provides a way for you to monitor changesets for a particular bounding box.

This is so cool! :-)

It was so great and wonderful to meet you in person :-)

@PlaneMad Thank you!

Do you tag the tree stumps as trees as well?

We did not tag tree stumps as trees.

I’m always confused when a plant becomes a tree and now my benchmark is if its 1 building floor high, its a tree!

This sounds interesting, this time there was no benchmark that we considered as most of the trees were quite tall. This would be helpful when we encounter such a situation.

I would recommend talking about this on [talk-us] as well. Gets more eyes on it. Most US users don’t see these diary entries.

@rickmastfan67 makes sense, will post this in the [talk-us] mailing list. Thank you!

@Glassman there is no wiki for noref=yes but this tag has being used 4 458 times and this is present in tag info - http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/noref#overview

maps.me devs are working towards making map updates much more frequent.

@Vincent de Phily that’ll be great!

I expect the main reason is that on some devices (including my android moto g) the cross-hairs don’t show so you have to guess at where the centre of the screen is when adding new features.

@RobJN there are all possibilities of that being the reason.

You don´t know daily updates .

Thomas8122 I did not know about it, but thank you for the information. The application does not point out to this, so it’s difficult to update it.

As for the “Issues that are concerning” have you created issues for this on their GitHub repo? Because only complaining in this blog would be unfair…

Agree to this @YieldMapper, here is the issue.

@SomeoneElse @paul Johnson Thank you for the comments. These are valuable suggestions and we will keep this in mind while going forward towards the next projects. For now, our focus is only towards adding missing exit numbers on the motorway junctions and then following it up with addition of the missing destination=* tags.

@mvexel I have a question regarding the field Number of passes.

What does it actually signify? How is it related to the turn-restrictions?

@SomeoneElse

There are no open data sources that I know, which could help me verify the number of mis-tagged picnic_sites or number of picnic sites that are un-mapped.

@AndersAndersson thank you so much for the appreciation! :)

Thank you everyone for the feedback.

@escada thank you for sharing the link to the code of conduct.

This correction falls into acceptable usage category. There is no need to have a wiki page for the this tag as the current wiki already states about the current tag tourism=picnic_site being the correct one.

I’ll be following the guidelines in the code of conduct and will be doing the following:

• Create a single changeset for a country, so that if there is any need to revert anything it can be done easily.

• Document all the changesets created while adding the tags, thus making it easy for anyone to look at them.

• Will have a standard changeset comment Re-tagging picnic sites with tourism=picnic_site tag https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/147

@Shravan91 and @Robert Thank you! @Super-Map Thank you for sharing your experience!

Thank you so much @Peter!

Glad to know the excitement one has to make the most detailed map of the place where they have been bought up! Nice diary @saikabhi!

प्रतीक, आपने बहुत अच्छी कोशिश की हैं, हम सबको हिन्दी टॅगिंग के बारें में बताने की! अगर किसी को इंग्लीश से हिन्दी में नाम या कोई भी शब्द लिखना हो तो यह लिंक पे जा सकतें हैं.

@KVLA-HRO-Mei I’ll surely check out eWorld. Thank you :)

@bob_sim This was really helpful, will surely try it to make simulation better. Thank you.

@!i! We can add the POIs by using the additional polygons, but i’m uncertain about the simulator detecting it.

We can manually simulate the area around the required POIs. (for eg. School, this can be done with some approximate numbers as to n% of parents , one can simulate the traffic scenario near a school and predict some improvements accordingly)

@PlaneMad Thank you for the tutorials!

@pratikyadav Thanks!

@!i! Oh! Seems interesting, will surely check that out. Thank you!

@onion I haven’t tried it though, it seems to be possible to simulate bus traffic from OSM bus routes.