Welcome to OSM!

Welcome to OSM!

Hello,
Please take another look at the data you've imported as well as the various wiki pages for the Canvec import. I see some issues right away:
1. You appear to be importing more than the approved data types (e.g. osm.org/relation/18736785 , osm.org/way/1361881766 , osm.org/way/1361881990)
2. Footways overlapping other highways. No highway=* objects from Canvec should be uploaded. (e.g. osm.org/way/1361881992 , osm.org/way/1361881766)
3. Overlapping water areas. (e.g. osm.org/way/1361881743 , osm.org/way/1361881859 , osm.org/way/1361881987)
4. Deprecated tagging leftover. (e.g. osm.org/way/1361881987 )
5. Duplicate place=*: osm.org/node/12609014267
6. Duplicate natural=water on nodes (e.g. osm.org/node/12608030522 , osm.org/node/12606175009)
7. Relation with only a source tag: osm.org/relation/18736805
8. Duplicate nodes (e.g. osm.org/node/2442258591 , osm.org/node/12608016044)

Most of the above are only examples of each issue (the first few I came across). There are likely more examples out there as well as more issues; I only looked at a few small areas which you imported.
Unfortunately, importing Canvec isn't quite as simple as just uploading the data to OSM. There's a lot of prep work, conflation, validation, and cleanup that has to go into it.

Happy Mapping,
jmarchon

Welcome to OSM and thanks for getting this updated!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162724573

Oh yeah, it's wonderful. I probably used it here too, going off the tag "source=Bing; DOGAMI Lidar" on the changeset. Thank you though :-)

Welcome to OSM and thanks for getting this restaurant added!

I think this is the train station here? osm.org/relation/10336724

Oops, thanks for catching my mistake!

Looks to me like you added a duplicate here. Would you mind taking another look?

Something went wrong here - the changeset comment here was supposed to say "Canvec 024G01-02".

Welcome to OSM!

Welcome back to OSM!

Nope, that was an accident. Thanks for catching it. You're welcome to delete them, otherwise I'll do it later today.

That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.

Hi Mateusz, Isn't area=yes needed for highway=footway areas?

I feel you. That's often how it goes for me as well.
Are you the caseywittmier on the OSMUS Slack?

Nice work, thanks for getting all this info added!

Hello! Please note ESRI imagery here is very old (>10 years IIRC). It looks like you updated a couple of things around the radiation center that were reconstructed since then.

Reverted

osm.org/changeset/161281652

Reverted

osm.org/changeset/161281620