jonorossi's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
94095167 | over 4 years ago | I've found it very common for Courts to have street numbers in sequence like that rather than odd one side even the other. |
93848955 | over 4 years ago | Cuscal used to own and operate the rediATMs, but looks like it was sold to Armaguard Group last year. I remember nab left as a partner a couple years ago they definitely never operated them, you get charged fees to use them now (I'm a nab customer). There are definitely 2 postboxes outside the AusPost shop, red and yellow just next to the glass door. I think there used to be a payphone near the main northern entrance but you'd have to confirm. |
93666336 | over 4 years ago | Shouldn't the end of Holloway St and Waterview Pl have a footway joining them instead of noexit=yes, or is there now a fence blocking foot/cycle access? |
93394762 | over 4 years ago | Cheers |
91849849 | over 4 years ago | Australia is a bit of a mix between whether it is allowed, in QLD as long as there is no sign prohibiting it (e.g. Queen Street Mall, and other outdoor dining on footpath) then you are allowed, it is much safer for kids and casual riders.
I get emails for other people's comments on OSM, you might need to change your settings. Thanks for getting back to me. |
93394762 | over 4 years ago | It used to be a flower farm before being sold in the last few years. Aren't most of them greenhouses not sheds? |
93165765 | almost 5 years ago | Ah, but the building is not an overpass over the footpath. Interestingly you can get rid of the warning by just splitting the footway and joining it to the boundary, I'd do that and tag it highway=corridor+indoor=yes. |
93165765 | almost 5 years ago | Was layer=1 on the building intentional? If so, what for? I'm curious because I don't understand the need. Nice work on the upgrades, I think quite a few of those shops no longer exist though, but that's another problem. |
93123848 | almost 5 years ago | Nice work. I've corrected a few things and added more tagging in changeset 93148848. I've been inside so it helps :) You missed the western greenhouse, I marked the northern one access=no because that is staff only, I changed the parking tags because I think the first parking lot is staff parking (I've always parked in front of the main shed not near the loading docks). I couldn't find the best tag to indicate it is trade only, so added shop=trade, trade=* should probably be landscaping or something. |
93038671 | almost 5 years ago | You've removed the building=* tag from the building and added landuse=plant_nursery to the building (renders green now), which isn't very accurate as there are no plants inside the big shed only under the northern awning and outside (sometimes with shade cloth). I've made some changes in changeset 93089856 including adding some more detail. Happy to discuss if you disagree with my changes. Jono |
93006454 | almost 5 years ago | Completely agree. I've found a bunch of places that the MSFTOpenMaps project added roads names in inappropriate places (including private driveways at end of streets) over the last few months, I caught a pile as they were added but in the peak there was about 100 changesets a day to review. Make sure to remove the "source:name" tag. |
92773808 | almost 5 years ago | No need to apologise, thanks for fixing it so quickly! Great work adding more detail along Kinross lately. |
92773808 | almost 5 years ago | Are you sure that property on Pararoma Dr has a ford along their driveway and not a culvert? It sort of looks like the concrete culvert ends are in aerial imagery. |
91949243 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Mick, welcome to OSM. Areas tagged with building=* should only cover the building itself, not the land around it, see osm.wiki/Key:building for more info. That then lets us add building=shed, leisure=swimming_pool, etc. We then use a different area usually over all contiguous land for the same purpose with a landuse=* tag. e.g. landuse=residential over the private land but not usually the roads. Often landuse areas get mapped before individual buildings because you can add a landuse=retail as a simple rectangle in a minute, but feel free to add whichever level of detail you like first, especially areas you know well. The OSM Wiki is a great resource to understand established tagging. Jono |
91849849 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, could you please explain why you are changing footpaths from highway=footway to highway=path, but more importantly why you are adding bicycle=no when cycling is permitted on footpaths in QLD. |
90836093 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks |
90836093 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, great work with most of the changes, however you've extended Yasmin Court into private land, the cul de sac ends where it was before, just outside the purple roof house. |
88035777 | about 5 years ago | Ignore the last comment, I thought you were working for the Microsoft OSM team but got confused, they've been making hundreds of changesets a day. |
88035777 | about 5 years ago | Oh, sorry. I don't live there, but know someone who does. My understanding is the whole estate/neighbourhood has always been Logandale (the welcome sign out on Beenleigh Redland Bay Road has been there as long as I can remember), there are however two townhouse developments inside the estate, Logandale Lakes on Peninsula Avenue and Huntingdale East on Gleneagles Avenue. I've just added those 2 townhouse/unit areas. Side note: thank your team for working on adding street names around SE QLD, amazing to see so many were missing. |
88035777 | about 5 years ago | Hi, I've reverted (changeset 88062705) this changeset. Logandale is a place (in the surburb of Cornubia), it has signage, parks, a gatehouse, security guards, a web site, etc. I've changed (changeset 88062955) it to a place=neighbourhood as that appears to be a better tag than hamlet. I'd recommend not just deleting something you haven't verified on the ground, the person who added it didn't do it for no reason. Jono |