Cheers, thanks for fixing it. It looks like there might be a subtle renderer defect too, the area name doesn't show on zoom level 17, but does both in and out from there.

I should add that when I zoom in now, I get 2 labels, the area "The Sleeman Centre" in bigger bold text, and your new node "Sleeman Sports Complex" label below it in smaller text.

Hi jordol, I noticed you've created a node named "Sleeman Sports Complex" and tagged leisure=sports_centre. Is there a reason for this since there is already an area around the whole complex named and tagged correctly?

Hi Upstream446, welcome to OSM. I noticed that you've incorrectly tagged this residential area with golf=fairway. Could you please correct it. Thanks

Thanks for the reply, I didn't see that you had added it, there have been so many edits lately with the same changeset message I haven't been able to look at every single one via my OSMCha feed. I'll add this oneway back in.

I hadn't noticed all these changesets were coming from the Microsoft OSM team, great work. I don't know if it is possible to improve with your team's workflow, but I find the current changeset message not very useful.

Hi, what source are you using to remove the oneway tag here? St Luke's school driveway is definitely oneway, it has signs on both entrance and exit to Degen Road.

The park you mapped is wrongly created as an unclosed way, and is also over 2 houses and a road on Jacklin Court, I don't see an unmapped park nearby in aerial imagery. I've not yet checked the remaining changes, but can you take another look at your changes.

Hi, great to see Ausbuild staff contributing to OSM. You added a bunch of streets to the west of Kinross Rd that haven't been built yet.

One of the core principles of OSM is verifiability, since they don't exist on the ground they should be marked with either proposed or construction. Since the fence at the end of Highfield has been moved I've modified them to construction.

I've not updated The Habitat Estate as I can't get in there.

I've never mapped a business' ABN before, seems unnecessary to maintain in OSM. I guess it is also only verifiable by looking at an invoice from a business, so not really something you can easily observe, I wouldn't mind if you just dropped it.

While you are there I also think internet_access=no should be removed, I wouldn't generally expect an industrial business to offer public WiFi, so no need to explicitly define "no".

Thanks, Jono

This change is incorrect. According to their web site the phone number is 1300 627 537, and their ABN is as was specified.

I suspect it wasn't the intention, but "internet_access=yes" means "a map entity such as a building, a shop, restaurant, etc. offers internet access to the public, either as a paid service or even for free." (from the OSM Wiki).

Hi, welcome to OSM. You've added your business details to the node for 17 Alexandra Pl (in the middle of the common area), there is another node on top of Unit 1, you should use that one instead, unless your business occupies all 5 units. Feel free to draw an outline for your building if you want to replace the unit 1 node.

Hi, you've tagged residential mailboxes with amenity=post_box. According to the wiki they are "A box to deposit outgoing postal items", I think you want amenity=letter_box.

No need to be sorry, thanks for fixing.

Not sure why you removed the path though, it was good except you accidentally connected it twice with 2 separate nodes on the asphalt driveway, probably just an accidental mouse click. Let me know if it isn't clear what went wrong, happy to help.

Thanks for getting involved, you are doing great work, glad to see another local mapping.

Jono

Hi, you've connected this new path to the asphalt driveway with two nodes, this is obviously wrong, could you please fix it. Let me know if you are unsure how to.

On a related note, it would be appreciated to write useful changeset comments, you haven't changed any buildings in this changeset.

Thanks, Jono

Hi, you've dragged a node of Sandy Creek out near Kingfisher Road; and that area of vineyard you've mapped near SupaGolf hasn't been a vineyard for many years even though you can see an impression of rows, there is no trellis. Could you please fix those up, Thanks, Jono

Hi, I'm trying to understand (your changeset message is empty) why you've changed the access on this track I mapped to no access by foot. When I mapped it there were no signs indicating no access and it is a public road reserve, council even have a fancy timber gate to walk through on the SE end. Thanks

Thanks

Guessing there is a ford where there could be a culvert or bridge isn't ideal, you shouldn't map something just to hide the warning message about a highway and waterway crossing if you can't determine what is there from aerial imagery.

I had no problem with fords as nodes especially for small fords, it is actually suggested on the wiki for fords to be a shared node between highway and waterway as they are the same layer; the strangeness I saw was that you created a separate standalone node (referred to as a "point" in iD) which wasn't part of either way.

Hello again, did you see my comment?