OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
168058289 about 2 months ago

For the F thing, for example in iD:
- create a new object
- click a node on an existing node of a nearby way (the tool now which line you want to follow)
- click on a consecutive point of that way (now it know in what direction to follow)
- type F for as long as you want to follow
- at every "junction" of lines you'll need to chose which line to follow next, by simply clicking again on the next node you want to follow

168058289 about 2 months ago

Can you give an example of that? My comment was triggered by this one: osm.org/relation/19284328
Using an existing line for creating more polygons is just hitting F a few times, that hardly seems like more work than creating a new multipolygon? (and then there's still the added complexity I mentioned before)

167241175 about 2 months ago

Bedankt!

167659926 about 2 months ago

Something appears to have gone wrong with the date format of your import here. Also osm.org/way/1395551885/history is not a house :)

167710694 about 2 months ago

Ook hier heb je lege ruimte gelaten, en te blindelings GRB gevolgd. Bij dit gebouw osm.org/way/747497377 heb je zelfs de grens van residential dwars door een gebouw laten lopen. De achterliggende percelen hier horen ook gewoon bij de tuinen lijkt het mij, dus residential moet hier zeker wat groter

168305330 about 2 months ago

Op terrein staan deze voetwegen gewoon aangegeven met de naam, niet het nummer. Zie voorbeeld: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.735084299972&lng=4.2792441999722&z=17&pKey=325037873107257&focus=photo&x=0.61569546701477&y=0.5722550358637561&zoom=2.3465567617728533
Je kan dus beter de naam zo laten, en vicinal_ref toevoegen om het nummer van de weg toe te voegen.

167312951 about 2 months ago

Bedankt!

167704812 about 2 months ago

Goh, ik weet het niet. Voor mijn use case is het voldoende om er gewoon voor te zorgen dat er voldoende extra info in (gestructureerde!) tags zit om het onderscheid te kunnen maken met "echte kerken".

167241175 about 2 months ago

Dat gezondheidscentrum, is dat wel echt een ziekenhuis? Op basis van de beschrijving op de website lijkt het me eerdere een clinic (ttz, je blijft er nooit meerdere dagen in functie van een ingreep)

168182170 about 2 months ago

Hi,
I can't find any online references to this new "memorial" hospital online. Can you help me find more info?

167844621 about 2 months ago

Hi there,
Since this appears to be a place where you can visit a single doctor, then it is definitely not a hospital (that's only with more facilities and possibility to stay several days). I remapped it as a doctor's practice.

167617084 about 2 months ago

Hi,
The CATTP is definitely not a hospital, as it offers services during the daytime only. I've looked at a few other facilities, but didn't find a perfect tag. I've mapped it as a psychotherapist for now, as in the end it is about mental health related therapy from what I understand.

167542879 about 2 months ago

It appears this is just a place where you can see a doctor, so I've changed the tag from hospital (where you have beds for patients that need to stay) to doctors

167312951 about 2 months ago

Zijn de winkels in Winkelcentrum De Ent bereikbaar langs binnen of moet je telkens naar buiten gaan? Indien het laatste, dan is shop=mall hier wellicht niet op zijn plaats

167954123 about 2 months ago

The main building appears to be a building with several shops inside (reachable from the inside). If that's true, than shop=mall should not have been removed as you did here. It can still remain as a building=retail, because it was probably built to house shops

167103013 about 2 months ago

The way you mapped this is a little strange. A more common way would be to map the outline as a simple polygon, and the parts of the building as building:part=yes. That logic comes from the "simple indoor tagging", which appears to be what you are trying to achieve here.
Also, it is very uncommon to have more than one value for the building tag, better just to pick one.

168058289 about 2 months ago

It's not wrong AFAIK, but the style you applied here to use relations for what could be simple polygons (to be able to reuse the borders) is not popular in Belgium, because it is more complex to understand and manage...

168095792 about 2 months ago

Hey Killian,
It's very important to us that the school gets a name. If you add these from the task, please try to find out what school we're talking about!

168053884 about 2 months ago

Als site outline en gebouw over hetzelfde gaan, dan kan je beter alle info op de outline zetten (eerder dan info to dupliceren). Ik heb een en ander al aangepast.

167784501 about 2 months ago

Daardoor is de kunstacademie wel geen school meer...