julcnx's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
134447561 | over 2 years ago | Hey there! Just wanted to give you a heads up that using motorcar=no is only for roads where there's a sign that says cars aren't allowed. For narrow roads, it's better to use highway=path and add a width tag. You can learn more about this in this forum post: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/re-classifying-service-alley-and-other-narrow-roads-chiang-mai/97397. Thanks!
|
134527530 | over 2 years ago | Hey there! I noticed that you made a change to a node in Germany while editing in Vietnam. Was this a mistake or unintended?
|
134527052 | over 2 years ago | hi Summittra, what is the meaning of your motorcar=no? is the road too narrow for cars? or is there a sign saying no cars are allowed ? Please refer to this thread for more info: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/re-classifying-service-alley-and-other-narrow-roads-chiang-mai/97397
|
134367886 | over 2 years ago | Hey, thanks a lot for your amazing work! Just a quick heads-up, in Thailand, the Bing imagery can sometimes be outdated or misaligned. Although it doesn't seem to be a problem in this particular area, it's always a good idea to double-check with other sources such as Maxar or Mapbox. Keep up the good mapping! |
121938813 | over 2 years ago | Hey Dave, Usually, I add source:name=sign when I see a sign at the entrance/exit of a village, but to be honest, I don't really remember this location and didn't upload any ground truth photos to Mapillary at the time (which I do now every time). So, it's quite possible that what you mentioned is correct. Please feel free to change it. On a side note, during that trip, we were amazed to find that most of the mapped tracks between settlements had been recently paved. There should be many more of these further west, but we were running out of time. As you found out, many of these may have refs and can be upgraded to tertiary. Cheers,
|
134177840 | over 2 years ago | hey, what did you change exactly? and why did you make both a change in South Africa and China?
|
134183670 | over 2 years ago | hey, what exact change did you make to the the Chiang Rai province ?
|
134157936 | over 2 years ago | thanks for the update. I moved the gate on the adjacent highway and out of the junction. for more info, see: osm.wiki/Key:barrier#How_to_map_barrier_nodes |
133929104 | over 2 years ago | what is the source for the access tags (motorcar=yes, motorcycle=no) ? I do not see any signs on Mapillary.
|
133964759 | over 2 years ago | if the road is indeed a dead-end, please do not forget to add `noexit=yes` on the last node. For more info, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/confirming-unconnected-highways/96522
|
132993916 | over 2 years ago | Hi AndrewCNX, these roads were correctly classified as per the Thailand wiki. They are not significant thru-traffic, nor their main purpose is to provide access to permanent residences. Service roads do not automatically imply private access and can be public without an access=* tag. Since we had already an exchange last year about this exact topic, and you seem to still not agree with the general consensus, I invite you again to take note of the Thailand Wiki definitions or share your concerns with the community. Until then, I have reverted your changes. Thank you for your understanding. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/thailand-s-minor-road-classifications-revision-proposal-unclassified-vs-service-vs-residential-vs-track/5805/5
|
132911359 | over 2 years ago | thanks for the addition :) if you know the road is passable by standard city cars, routers will find it useful to have a smoothness tag (intermediate or bad).
|
132925136 | over 2 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. A few tips for beginners like you:
|
132864176 | over 2 years ago | it's always better in English, but you can also do in Thai. e.g. "add bus stops". Note also that we are not supposed to add data directly from google :( but if you have local knowledge, you did a survey, or know about them, you can add the data.
|
132864176 | over 2 years ago | thank you for your contributions :) a little tip, add a better description to your changeset comment so other mappers can understand your changes: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments ขอบคุณสำหรับการมีส่วนร่วมของคุณ :) เคล็ดลับเล็กน้อย เพิ่มคำอธิบายที่ดีขึ้นในความคิดเห็นชุดการเปลี่ยนแปลงของคุณ เพื่อให้ผู้ทำแผนที่คนอื่นๆ สามารถเข้าใจการเปลี่ยนแปลงของคุณได้: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|
132821764 | over 2 years ago | Hi. are u sure both oneway streets run in the same direction?
|
132666451 | over 2 years ago | Hi. I changed the merged noexit=yes node to a barrier=gate. noexit=yes should be only used on disconnected road segments physically separated by wall/fence. Gates however should be used as nodes of existing road segments. More info: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-noexit-yes-nodes/9095
|
132559560 | over 2 years ago | Morning. why would you remove English name translations? These "name:en" are important and should not be removed. If the translations are incorrect, please simply replace their values.
|
132362549 | over 2 years ago | Thanks. I got confused with the order :)
|
87115139 | over 2 years ago | FYI, without further response from your side, I have removed this contribution.
|