julcnx's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
145991669 | over 1 year ago | Hi Russ, were you aware that according to the latest wiki upgrade, all officially recognized villages should be tagged as place=village, irrespective of their size? This information was documented last year under WikiProject Thailand's administrative levels section: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Administrative_levels. If you're uncertain about the official status, it's recommended to use place=village. |
145681455 | over 1 year ago | Your recent changeset has been reverted due to conflicting edits and a lack of communication. OpenStreetMap thrives on community collaboration. Reach out if you have questions or need help. Let's build better maps together :) |
139591518 | over 1 year ago | Your recent changeset has been reverted due to conflicting edits and a lack of communication. OpenStreetMap thrives on community collaboration. Reach out if you have questions or need help. Let's build better maps together! |
145315534 | over 1 year ago | Reverted changeset as the original mapper failed to provide any additional responses. |
145242372 | over 1 year ago | Reverted changeset as the original mapper failed to provide any additional responses. |
144647151 | over 1 year ago | Reverted changeset as the original mapper failed to provide any additional responses. |
145664020 | over 1 year ago | Hi AlaskaDave, happy new year, and hope all is well. I observed that you adjusted some of the lane tags from 2 to 1. However, I've noticed that even though certain streets lack lane markings, they appear wide enough for two cars to pass. Therefore, it might be appropriate to consider lanes=2 + lanes_marking=no instead as per the wiki.
|
145681455 | over 1 year ago | Hey rivw, thanks for your contributions! What is the need for a duplicated "Elephant Nature Park Office" name tag on a separate building? This info is already available on the node.
|
145520274 | over 1 year ago | Hey Jseegs87, big thanks for your help! Don't forget to upload your GPS traces on OSM so we've got the original layout on record. I went ahead and bumped up the footway to a path, sticking to the official Thailand wiki rules (link below). Any questions or issues, just hit me up. Cheers! Julien. osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_not_wide_enough_for_motor_cars |
145172403 | over 1 year ago | Great. Welcome to Thailand! I asked because organizations must communicate first their campaign plans with the local community. Please kindly pay attention to Thailand classification system and available imagery. Happy mapping! :) osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand |
145242372 | over 1 year ago | Sorry Risa_dinda, your edits do not match any available imagery. What source did you use?
|
145315534 | over 1 year ago | Hi Risa_dinda, what sources did you use? The street match no available imagery.
|
145172403 | over 1 year ago | Hi Enjennies, thank your for your contributions! I see you are from Indonesia? Are you by any chance part of an organization doing a mapping campaign in Chiang Mai, Thailand ? |
145143943 | over 1 year ago | Hi Risa_dinda, thank your for your contributions! I see you are from Indonesia? Are you by any chance part of an organization doing a mapping campaign in Chiang Mai, Thailand ? |
140351844 | over 1 year ago | สวัสดี odtvince, ขอบคุณมากสำหรับการมีส่วนร่วมของคุณ! เกี่ยวกับเส้นทาง 255454762, คุณได้เพิ่มทั้ง surface=asphalt และ tracktype=grade3 ทำให้เกิดความขัดแย้ง. ถนนที่มีพื้นผิวที่ถนนปูมีเพียง tracktype=grade1 เท่านั้น. คุณสามารถระบุได้ไหมว่าถนนนั้นมีพื้นผิวที่ถนนปูหรือไม่? |
140351844 | over 1 year ago | Hello odtvince, appreciation for your contributions! In relation to route 255454762, you included both surface=asphalt and tracktype=grade3, creating a conflict. A surfaced road should only have tracktype=grade1. Could you clarify if the road is paved or unpaved? |
144668376 | over 1 year ago | Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. You can find more information on changesets and their geographical size at: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Also adding a clear description makes it easier for others to review your changes: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|
144759434 | over 1 year ago | Hi geozeisig, could you please kindly point out where this mechanical tags upgrade has been documented ? Thanks, Julien
|
144647151 | over 1 year ago | Hi GreenRunner. thanks for your contribution. Your edit conflicts with existing tag "note=This trail is actually composed of steps cut into the ground for most of its length." Did the surface condition of this path changed ? If not, highway=steps may be appropriate as MTB would be discouraged to use this way.
|
140704569 | over 1 year ago | Thanks StarLord4K for your quick answer. I appreciate your feedback and all the contributions you have made, keep it up! :) If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me directly or the community via the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/th/53
|