julcnx's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
109205700 | about 4 years ago | Hope all is well. Would you mind please to always add a surface to track? (unpaved/paved if you are not sure of the exact type). Grab is currently upgrading the minor road network in Thailand and turning a lot of farming and village tracks into highway=residential and others
https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines/blob/main/README.md#add-surface-tag-important Much appreciated.
|
108007637 | about 4 years ago | How do you justify way 911546988 to be residential while there is no permanent residence along and the main purpose of the area is forestry?
|
109120188 | about 4 years ago | Please make smaller change subsets. Each changeset should be within a small geographical area (e.g. 100km max), so it's easier for others to review changes.
|
102607919 | about 4 years ago | Please refrain from curving sharp corners: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/49#issuecomment-739779345 |
107946829 | about 4 years ago | Bad tagging. Source tag missing. The whole area is private farm. Please correct accordingly. |
108254704 | about 4 years ago | I do not see a source tag so I assume you used Bing. The highway=path you added should be classified as track I believe. If you use recent satellite images like Maxar, it is pretty clear. From my experience, paths are rarely visible from satellite, when they are they stay as a thin line when zoomed in, unlike double tracks. |
108014122 | about 4 years ago | How can this be classified as residential? Does a single house at the beginning justify a residential tag? |
108530447 | about 4 years ago | Hi. No pb. Do you have any OSM guidelines document at GRABOSM you could share with me? Anything about classifications, geometries. e.g. when do you decide to use residential/unclassified/track/service? This would help a lot to prevent mismatches and save both sides a lot of time.
|
108199956 | about 4 years ago | seriously, bad changes?
|