Hi Andrew. thanks for your contribution!

Does the track looks like this osm.wiki/File:Grade4.jpg ?
If not, please choose the appropriate type from osm.wiki/Key:tracktype

Additionally, for off-road mapping in Chiang Mai, please refer to these rough guidelines https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
If you have any questions about them, feel free to contact me.

Cheers, Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110157844

Finally, please combine changes in the same geographical area into 1 changeset so it's easier for others to review. thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145262

- highway should be track to match the continuing road purpose
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145730

- is the road large enough for a pickup truck ? yes, then track is correct, otherwise use path
- access=no or access=private should only be used where road is within a private property and access is forbidden, please remove
- highway=track automatically gives legal access to all mode of transportation, please remove bicycle/foot
- highway=path automatically gives legal access to all transportation except motor-vehicles, please remove bicycle/foot
- bridge=yes + layer=1 should only be used on the physical bridge section, please remove
- I would not recommend witdth/smoothness/tracktype because they keep changing over each seasons, if you want to add them, make sure to maintain them (because no one will)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145946

Regarding your changeset:
- please use Maxar or ESRI instead of Bing which is outdated
- there is a clear change of surface, the road should be split into 2,
- make sure to use tracktype correctly (see https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines#avoid-tracktype)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145262

Thank you for your mapping contributions and review request!

First of all, please kindly refer to the official Thailand wiki guidelines, and specifically the new section for minor highway classification:
osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29

Additionally, for off-road mapping in Chiang Mai, please refer to these rough guidelines https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
If you have any questions about these guidelines, feel free to contact me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145262

- use amenity=university instead of leisure=park
- do not overlap feature with other objects like the road (use disconnect)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109973947

Thank you, feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the new minor road classification directives in the official Thai wiki osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102482038

- is the beginning of the road public and giving access to permanent residences? if yes, you might need to split the road into 2 segments and have the first part as residential and the second as service. if not highway=service works great.
- service=driveway are usually the very last small section leading to a building, the main roads around a property can be tagged as highway=service alone

You will find the latest guidelines for minor road classifications here: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109846031

- surface=bricks is not a valid value, always refer to the official list
- if you use access=private, then no need to tag private for bicycle/foot/horse/motor_vehicle...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109753132

Please refrain from submitting large geographical changesets spanning multiple countries.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109759981

Please refrain from submitting large geographical changesets spanning multiple countries.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109762514

source=GPS would be better because the GPX tracks is visible in layers (OpenStreetMap GPS traces) and survey is too general as it could be based on imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109720097

Please refrain from doing large geographical changesets.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109724961

Invalid landuse tag, I believe tourism=hotel should be sufficient, no?

osm.wiki/Key:landuse
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109725141

you should use a landuse tag for this area
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109725166

super, merci!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109695699

Please refrain from tagging agricultural tracks as residential
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107954868

Correct classification: osm.org/changeset/109612920
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109599773

- wrong classification: the main purpose of the roads seems to be access to agricultural fields (track). definitely not residential.
- lack of road split: straight section should be separated from building driveway
- do not curve corners at visible junctions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109599338