If everyone does large geographical changesets, then no one will want to review local changes in osmcha.org. What if a country has its own specific guidelines? Have you even considered that? -1
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110409629

In the past, many residential have been wrongly tagged as service+alley. If you are familiar with the area, feel free to change them to residential if you are sure they are not private roads/driveways (service). best, julien
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110365478

If a road is on private land, highway=service would be more appropriate with the corresponding access tag (e.g. customers). If the main purpose of a road is access to agricultural fields, a highway=track would be the better choice. In most cases unclassified should be only used for long through traffic roads linking villages and other destinations along a public road. For more info: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110326112

Maybe "description "would be more appropriate instead of name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110328181

thanks for cleaning up the map. I would however recommend keeping clearly visible minor roads (driveways, residential, and track). Many of these minor roads have been wrongly tagged, feel free to fix them based on the new official section for minor highway classification below, and let me know if you have any questions about them. thanks, julien
osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110314991

Marco, I already sent you a message. Please use Maxar instead of Bing. Some buildings you have added do not exist anymore. Please review your past edits, it is the responsibility of the mapper to respond to changeset discussions and correct them when necessary. If I do not hear further from you, I may have to flag you and revert your changesets.

มาร์โค ฉันส่งข้อความถึงคุณแล้ว โปรดใช้ Maxar แทน Bing อาคารบางหลังที่คุณเพิ่มไม่มีอยู่อีกต่อไป โปรดตรวจสอบการแก้ไขที่ผ่านมาของคุณ เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้ทำแผนที่ในการตอบกลับการอภิปรายเกี่ยวกับชุดการแก้ไขและแก้ไขเมื่อจำเป็น หากฉันไม่ได้ยินจากคุณเพิ่มเติม เราอาจต้องตั้งค่าสถานะคุณและเปลี่ยนชุดการเปลี่ยนแปลงของคุณ
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110307524

Hello Hein, a tip about names in general. "name" should be for the official local name, "name:en" for the English translation, "name:th" for the Thai name (often duplicated) If the official restaurant name is in Thai and you only know it in English, then only use "name:en". Cheers, Julien. See this example osm.org/node/4592605527/history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110203191

While the beginning of the road is clearly residential, the remaining part is mostly giving access to agricultural fields (track). The last part of the road might even be a private road (service). If you are not sure, do not add or split the road into multiple segments so it's easier to change later. thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110219289

Please refer to the official OSM Thailand guidelines for minor road classifications. osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110219289

Why curving the road at the end ? There is no clear visible path under it and the other property has its own road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110278154

Hello Marco, please kindly use Maxar or ESRI instead of Bing which has outdated imagery in Northern Thailand. Some of the buildings you added do not exists anymore. If you can, please also combine multiple edits in the same area within the same changesets so it is easier for others to review. Just curious, what has adding farming huts to do with a Malaria program? Best, Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110192623

Hi Andrew. thanks for your contribution!

Does the track looks like this osm.wiki/File:Grade4.jpg ?
If not, please choose the appropriate type from osm.wiki/Key:tracktype

Additionally, for off-road mapping in Chiang Mai, please refer to these rough guidelines https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
If you have any questions about them, feel free to contact me.

Cheers, Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110157844

Finally, please combine changes in the same geographical area into 1 changeset so it's easier for others to review. thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145262

- highway should be track to match the continuing road purpose
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145730

- is the road large enough for a pickup truck ? yes, then track is correct, otherwise use path
- access=no or access=private should only be used where road is within a private property and access is forbidden, please remove
- highway=track automatically gives legal access to all mode of transportation, please remove bicycle/foot
- highway=path automatically gives legal access to all transportation except motor-vehicles, please remove bicycle/foot
- bridge=yes + layer=1 should only be used on the physical bridge section, please remove
- I would not recommend witdth/smoothness/tracktype because they keep changing over each seasons, if you want to add them, make sure to maintain them (because no one will)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145946

Regarding your changeset:
- please use Maxar or ESRI instead of Bing which is outdated
- there is a clear change of surface, the road should be split into 2,
- make sure to use tracktype correctly (see https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines#avoid-tracktype)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145262

Thank you for your mapping contributions and review request!

First of all, please kindly refer to the official Thailand wiki guidelines, and specifically the new section for minor highway classification:
osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29

Additionally, for off-road mapping in Chiang Mai, please refer to these rough guidelines https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
If you have any questions about these guidelines, feel free to contact me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110145262

- use amenity=university instead of leisure=park
- do not overlap feature with other objects like the road (use disconnect)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109973947

Thank you, feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the new minor road classification directives in the official Thai wiki osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102482038

- is the beginning of the road public and giving access to permanent residences? if yes, you might need to split the road into 2 segments and have the first part as residential and the second as service. if not highway=service works great.
- service=driveway are usually the very last small section leading to a building, the main roads around a property can be tagged as highway=service alone

You will find the latest guidelines for minor road classifications here: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109846031