hey, thanks for your contributions! For future changes, please make sure to use "name" for the local name (most of the time Thai) and "name:en" for the English translation. If the local name is in English (e.g. restaurant), the Thai translation can go in "name:th", otherwise this "name:th" is optional. Thanks! Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118729582

Thank you for your contributions!

In the future, please kindly use a better changeset description so that other mappers can understand your changes:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118427095

What source did you use for the street names?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118332050

Please kindly use place=neighborhood for gated residential complex (mubans).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118332213

Thanks for the heads up. I will contact asap ESRI and submit a ticket to iD to include a warning to users when using the Custom Layer feature.

hi woodpeck. Good point. Data is listed and visible from local government amphoe.com and points to a deprecated public ESRI map. I didn't see any API key requirements, or any restriction in the License section, and I thought since ESRI Imagery is already supported by iD with the World_Imagery service, it would not be an issue, or was I wrong ?
Imagery page: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=30e5fe3149c34df1ba922e6f5bbf808f
Imagery url: https://{switch:services,server}.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Topo_Map/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x}

FYI, I removed the Raming tea "hamlet" node, because the housing is not a village but a government facility. I also moved the nearby Raming Tea cafe to the new location 1km north-east, as per my last visit. If you feel something is missing or incorrectly tagged, please feel free to correct it. Thanks, Julien

Hi fringo. Are these roads you reclassified as service within a private estate with gates and clear restricted access? If unsure, please kindly refer to the official wiki guidelines: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117725254

Hi nitinatsangsit, what source did u use for the Mae Hong Son - Chiang Mai boundary? According to google and WorldStreetmap, a large section seems out of place by a large offset, so wanted to check with you first before improving it. Cheers, Julien

I have only downgraded tertiary a few times when they don't have a ref and looks out of place. Like you have done here: osm.org/changeset/117586823
Also I have corrected a few major segments where the residential bypass was tagged as the main road.
I have and will continue upgrade many tracks and residential to unclassified, and tertiary when I find a ref.
If you find any conflicting changes, let me know. Cheers, Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116100656

Ok. It was definitely a mistake from my part. I should have contacted the original mapper first. If I recall, I didn't see any local signs showing there is a 4049 tertiary road here. Do you have any good online source to confirm these refs?

Hi Russ. which exact road segment you are talking about?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116100656

Hi cdhormann.

I am doing some map cleanup and adding missing tags in areas you have been mapping offroad.

Could you please kindly confirm:
- that all roads you added or modified in general are based on a ground survey/gps trace ?
- that you used tracktype values based on global wiki recommendation ? osm.wiki/Key:tracktype

Much appreciated,
Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104754648

Hi Spenc142,

What did you mean by using highway=tag+motor_vehicle=yes ?

That it would be passable by 4wd ? or motocross ?

e.g. osm.org/way/696205873/history

PS: doing some cleanup in Chiang Mai, your feedback will be appreciated ;)
Thanks,
Julien

Hi Johnny, the tags are conflicting. If the access to the road is restricted due to gates, highway=service may be more appropriate. Otherwise if the road is not suitable to motor vehicles (motor_vehicle=no), it should be tagged as highway=path+motorcycle=yes or highway=footway if only suitable by foot. highway=unclassified is reserved for minor roads frequently used for through traffic or to reach a specific destination (hotel, temple, attraction…)
For more info, please refer to osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116455984

Thank you for fixing these issues.
In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116353588

Please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. Thank you! For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116234687

Please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. Thank you! For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116207752

In the future, please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also please kindly use a proper changeset description so that other mappers can understand your changes:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116065933

Thank you for your contributions! In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116061889