This small road section is not accessible by walking. Is this correct?

osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=42.5111%2C1.5470%3B42.5177%2C1.5559#map=15/42.5195/1.5383&layers=N

There seems to be some inconsistency. The bridge has no maxweight tag but this road has one?

osm.org/way/309273551

Is this lift_gate passable for motor vehicles? Can we even add access=yes?

Das ist aktuell eine Baustelle. Wenn ich wüßte wie lang die dauert, würde ich das so eintragen und die Routing engines würden das berücksichtigen :)

highway=cycleway und bicycle=no wie passt das zusammen oder ist das falsches tagging und meint eigentlich highway=construction?

Siehe https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/1098

Map the as route relation via a list of OSM ways? See wiki: "useful for very long ferry routes"

Is this longish thing, really the name of the street? I fear this is an auto created thing, as it also included the way id

osm.org/way/240141905

The bridge should have a toll indication?

There must be a shorter path for walking to the holywood sign. Currently one has to go via canyon drive+brush canyon etc because the gates at beachwood drive+hollyridge drive forbid access