OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
114462447 over 1 year ago

Where did the (beach) number 324 come from?

137981820 over 1 year ago

Was this edit supposed to be applied to a different trail? This trail is asphalt, not concrete.

131168971 over 1 year ago

camp_pitch looks like it is more appropriate than addr:housenumber.
I think having add:street would be beneficial here.
Parks Victoria refers to campsites by site number and the avenue they are on, so I see addr:street as beneficial. It also helps to indicate which road the pitch entry is on, particular for sites on a corner.

144192329 over 1 year ago

Oops. In amongst updating all the bus relations I forgot to tag it as a roundabout. Fixed now.

138964694 about 2 years ago

Why did you delete the service=parking tag instead of correcting it to service=parking_aisle?

136834774 about 2 years ago

It looks like you have copied houses without updating the address. There are now have 22 buildings, all of which are tagged as 17 Grevillea Drive, and a similar number with 12 Telopea Street. If you know the correct address for these houses please update their address tags. If you don't know the addresses then remove the address tags from the building.

135386009 over 2 years ago

This is a confusing edit. You have removed highway=footway which means that the bridge is no longer shown on most renders of the map. You set foot=no which says that you are not allowed to walk over the bridge, and your comment is "added a wheelchair route" which doesn't match the 2 changes made.
What were you edit trying to do with this edit?

130771260 over 2 years ago

I have visited both these locations and the added streets are not visibly under construction. What was the source for these streets? Should they be changed to proposed? Or should they be removed as they aren't an accurate representation of what is on the ground?

130771260 over 2 years ago

What source was used for these new roads?

119600054 over 3 years ago

Thanks. Looks good now.

119600054 over 3 years ago

This change appears to have reverted the East end of way 687895266 to the old alignment. The old alignment can be seen in Bing aerial imagery, while the new alignment can be seen in Maxr Premium Imagery.

112898380 over 3 years ago

What is your source for changes to way 49075481? A gravel path that does not have signs allowing cyclists.

110654879 almost 4 years ago

The roundabout (way 951677384) was removed in changeset: 110644085. See that changeset for further discussion.

110644085 almost 4 years ago

Why did you remove the roundabout at Knees Road and Arundel Road?

110654879 almost 4 years ago

Why did you remove the roundabout at Arundel Road and Knees Road?

88285752 over 4 years ago

What was your source for these changes to way 25313938? Last time I visited this bridge it had cyclist dismount signs. This contradicts the current tags of bicycle=designated and highway=cycleway. Have the cyclists dismount signs been removed?

82864629 almost 5 years ago

Any objections if I move the turning circle at the end of Pumps Road back to where it was and add a path to connect Pumps Road to the Eastlink Trail?

82864629 almost 5 years ago

Agreed that there is a path which joins Pumps Road to Eastlink. This would be better represented in OSM as a separate path which connects them together.

82864629 almost 5 years ago

Why was Pumps road joined to Eastlink trail? I've visited this location and the turning circle at the end of Pumps road is separate to Eastlink trail.

48107495 over 8 years ago

Description should be "update bike path surface". Can change descriptions be updated one submitted?