Nope! Thanks for catching that.

noted!

FYI, the City does maintain a demolitiosn dataset, so it would be easy to validate and remove old buildings. I'd guess something like 3-5% of the mapped residential stock from ~2014 is now gone.

Thanks for catching that. I use mapbox for building footprints bc it's higher spatial res and free of tree canopy. but I do sometimes miss recent demolitions.

Thanks for all your StreetComplete contributions... Detroit CBD is looking great!

Hi GNR8, Thanks for all your work to complete building footprints in the Detroit metro. I have a small favor to ask: when you map blocks in the City of Detroit, could you make sure to complete all building footprints on a block? It's hard to distinguish between incomplete mapping and highly vacant blocks. This is less of an issue in the suburbs.

Thanks, noted.

Thanks for the update! If you haven't, please do revert my edit.

Thanks, it looks like I inadvertently attached a parking area to the existing residential area. I've now made some refinements along the northern boundary to exclude retail. IMO, the feature should be subdivided.

Hi indukun. I think this is mistagged. To me, this looks like a recent home demolition, not a service road.

Thanks! Will fix

Great! Please do retag any other CR I have mistagged since last Jan. I'll rollback others as I come across them.

Sure, Ian! https://www.falconheights.org/residents/e-mail-notifications

Thanks for your edits. Please correct these changes to show the building footprint, not the parcel boundary.

The Maxar imagery is the most recently available, but low res and poor alignment. Local survey or known correction factor would improve.

Thanks for the note, StudentinGear. I see What landuse tag would you recommend for government buildings?

Thanks! Nice to know you noticed the project. I only have plans to do the Iskandar region for now--manually tracing land use is time intensive.

Works for me! Editing from Detroit, so I trust your insight on this.

Hi contrapuntus,

As a remote mapper, I'm glad to defer to local information. I pulled this and a few other forest outlines from this DUAC report on urban greenways.

http://e.duac.org/images/pdf/4%20Delhi%20Greenways.pdf

I haven't determined why, but this relation seems to have affected the riverbank multipolygon (Way 328738345). Suggest reversion and applying the fix separately.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61455472

Thanks, noted. You're right that I failed to update this one and a view others in iD.