Hi indukun. I think this is mistagged. To me, this looks like a recent home demolition, not a service road.

Thanks! Will fix

Great! Please do retag any other CR I have mistagged since last Jan. I'll rollback others as I come across them.

Sure, Ian! https://www.falconheights.org/residents/e-mail-notifications

Thanks for your edits. Please correct these changes to show the building footprint, not the parcel boundary.

The Maxar imagery is the most recently available, but low res and poor alignment. Local survey or known correction factor would improve.

Thanks for the note, StudentinGear. I see What landuse tag would you recommend for government buildings?

Thanks! Nice to know you noticed the project. I only have plans to do the Iskandar region for now--manually tracing land use is time intensive.

Works for me! Editing from Detroit, so I trust your insight on this.

Hi contrapuntus,

As a remote mapper, I'm glad to defer to local information. I pulled this and a few other forest outlines from this DUAC report on urban greenways.

http://e.duac.org/images/pdf/4%20Delhi%20Greenways.pdf

I haven't determined why, but this relation seems to have affected the riverbank multipolygon (Way 328738345). Suggest reversion and applying the fix separately.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61455472

Thanks, noted. You're right that I failed to update this one and a view others in iD.