mappinglander's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
125454736 | almost 3 years ago | hello,
|
66425630 | about 3 years ago | hello, are you still sure that here lies a military area? there are no visible traces from aerial whatsoever. |
122447952 | about 3 years ago | Hello, I've corrected this one - it should be shop=telecommunication rather than office=telecommunication as highlighted by the wiki. If you believe that this is wrong, feel free to revert. |
118611339 | over 3 years ago | onun dışında
|
113778965 | over 3 years ago | ekran görüntüsü: https://wtf.roflcopter.fr/pics/tTWlxxOH/EDh6qBM4.PNG
|
12682821 | over 3 years ago | osm.org/relation/2343895
|
113268367 | over 3 years ago | Merhabalar,
|
112588298 | almost 4 years ago | Merhabalar, arsayı neden temizlediğinizi sorabilir miyim? |
112390010 | almost 4 years ago | Merhabalar, bu düzenlemenin neden oluşturulduğunu açıklayabilir misiniz? oluşturduğunuz yerlerde herhangi bir cami yok. |
111689783 | almost 4 years ago | Also, don't always use Bing as source, because it's usually very old. Maxar is usually newer. |
111689783 | almost 4 years ago | I think that the name of relation could be clarified, maybe via adding a note tag saying "this relation is intended for grouping the military installations along turkish-syrian border" or something like that. Also, "type=boundary" is not for physical installations, and will likely cause rendering errors, hence I also suggest using another type=* tag, e.g. type=collection |
111689783 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, could I ask about why did you create this relation? the military installations and the border is already mapped. |
103963302 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, to be honest I didn't also find an exact source but it seems like the Marmara Sea is considered as an internal water by Turkey, (see http://www.sam.gov.tr/pdf/perceptions/Volume-III/june-august-1998/GunduzAybayNiluferOral.pdf , the article claims it was declared as internal water in Montreux Convention with no opposition.) but the straits seem problematic. I suggest reverting the border to prior version because I also wasn't able to see any source mentions in marineregions.org about Marmara Sea boundary even though it's drawn with 12 nm boundary and it actually sounds a bit weird as I've said before. |
103963302 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, can I ask why did you create the border zone in the sea, if you are willing to explain? I don't know much about sea boundaries but it seemed weird to have country boundary in the middle of sea. |
110097185 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, seems like you have switched the whole trunk road to motorway, as well as switching the link roads to motorways. Please don't do that and also consider using JOSM. |
110282266 | almost 4 years ago | Hello,
|
781903 | almost 4 years ago | seems like this import spammed some extra nodes, I guess the quality of the dataset can be considered a bit low. |
13322928 | about 4 years ago | Hello, I've fixed the concern you stated in the fixme tag after 9 years. Thanks for leaving that note. |
108415702 | about 4 years ago | Also, for the next time, please split your changesets; and if you have any questions, please look to osm.org/help |
108415702 | about 4 years ago | Hello, could you please explain that why did you changed a vacuum cleaner shop in Belgium and a hospital in India to a internet cafe, while connecting the node at India to a way and a residential area via relation? |