I think that the name of relation could be clarified, maybe via adding a note tag saying "this relation is intended for grouping the military installations along turkish-syrian border" or something like that. Also, "type=boundary" is not for physical installations, and will likely cause rendering errors, hence I also suggest using another type=* tag, e.g. type=collection

Hello, could I ask about why did you create this relation? the military installations and the border is already mapped.

Hello, to be honest I didn't also find an exact source but it seems like the Marmara Sea is considered as an internal water by Turkey, (see http://www.sam.gov.tr/pdf/perceptions/Volume-III/june-august-1998/GunduzAybayNiluferOral.pdf , the article claims it was declared as internal water in Montreux Convention with no opposition.) but the straits seem problematic. I suggest reverting the border to prior version because I also wasn't able to see any source mentions in marineregions.org about Marmara Sea boundary even though it's drawn with 12 nm boundary and it actually sounds a bit weird as I've said before.

Hello, can I ask why did you create the border zone in the sea, if you are willing to explain? I don't know much about sea boundaries but it seemed weird to have country boundary in the middle of sea.

Hello, seems like you have switched the whole trunk road to motorway, as well as switching the link roads to motorways. Please don't do that and also consider using JOSM.

Hello,
the border around the lake seems disputed by Azerbaijan and Armenia, according to various sources I've got from internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2021_Armenia%E2%80%93Azerbaijan_border_crisis https://www.bbc.com/azeri/azerbaijan-57176601 ). I am reverting the border to prior position (the border established by USSR era), because seems like there is an uncertainty about it.

seems like this import spammed some extra nodes, I guess the quality of the dataset can be considered a bit low.

Hello, I've fixed the concern you stated in the fixme tag after 9 years. Thanks for leaving that note.

Also, for the next time, please split your changesets; and if you have any questions, please look to osm.org/help

Hello, could you please explain that why did you changed a vacuum cleaner shop in Belgium and a hospital in India to a internet cafe, while connecting the node at India to a way and a residential area via relation?

Hello, I've realized you have added streams around Narman, but some of those rivers' alignment was poor, and therefore I had to fix by hand. Could I ask if you can draw it as more detailed for the next time so I wouldn't need to spend time to re-aligning the waterways? Thanks very much.

Hello, I've seen you have created a node in Black Sea by probably thinking it doesn't exists on OpenStreetMap and therefore you added a node with incorrect tagging.

Let me correct about it: there's already a node for Black Sea at osm.org/node/7015642404, and the correct tagging for seas should be place=sea, according to (osm.wiki/Tag:place%3Dsea)[wiki].

Merhabalar, yanlışlıkla ana caddeyi mahalle sınırlarına bağladığınızı gördüm, ondan dolayı yolu düzelttim. Bilginize

Hello, I've recently seen you have deleted "railway=abandoned" tag but I think it shouldn't be removed because old rail line submerged due to dam reservoir.

The issue has been fixed.

Merhabalar, düzenlemeniz gerçekte orada olmayan bir bina oluşturduğu için düzenlemenizi geri aldım. Bina etiketi yerleşim alanıyla aynı şey demek değildir. Eğer düzenleme ile ilgili herhangi bir sorunuz olursa buradan yazabilir veya şuradan (osm.org/help) bakabilirsiniz.

Merhabalar,
Bu değişiklikte tam olarak ne yapmaya çalıştınız? Park alanı eklemenize karşın orada bir park alanı olmadığı çok bariz.

Hello,
What exactly did you try to do in this changeset? Although you added a park area, it is obvious that there is not a park area.

I think that if the ship stays for weeks (which seems as that according to news), then it's permanent enough to add to OpenStreetMap. Otherwise, I wouldn't map.

Merhabalar ve düzenlemeleniz için teşekkürler,
Düzenlemede yolları alanlara bağladığınızı gördüm. Lütfen yapmayın çünkü hem yollar çizgi oldukları için fiziksel olarak bir bağlantıları yok hem de bunun böyle olması üzerinde düzenleme yapmayı hayli zorlaştırıyor. İsterseniz yol alanı oluşturup bu alanları ona bağlayabilirsiniz lakin tek başına bu alanları yollara bağlamayınız. Ayrıca, lütfen hiçbir şeyi idari sınırlara bağlamamaya çalışınız çünkü diğer türlü düzeltmesi hayli zor oluyor. Anlayışınız için teşekkürler.

Merhabalar,
Yaptığınız düzenlemenin gözden geçirilmesini istediğiniz için düzenlemeye baktım ve size geri bildirim vermek istedim. Düzenlemeniz gayet iyi gözüküyor.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101428346