OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
58333716 over 5 years ago

Hello,
can you draw a tourism=camp_site for the whole area (including tents zone, caravan zone, ...) ?
Thanks

67241631 over 5 years ago

Hello,
osm.org/way/194300601
what's this ? a tourism area where ppl send leisure time ? that look like to be a amenity=parking_space for car and caravans.
I also find strange that a area inside a parking get its own addr:housenumber. it'sn't the same for the whole parking ?
Regards,
Marc

69177622 over 5 years ago

Hello,
osm.org/way/683526813
is it the same module as the one that exists nearby?
машинный перевод: это тот же модуль, что и тот, который существует поблизости?

56972517 over 5 years ago

un autre contributeur vient d'ajouter la valeur wikidata d'une ville (à 2n endroits différents), cela me sembble tout aussi erroné à cet endroit là, surtout qu'il a laissé l'info camping en meme temps

56972517 over 5 years ago

mais du coup que représente l'objet que vous avez créée ? c'est un lieu pour planter sa tente pendant les quelques jours que dure votre expédition ? c'est le nom d'un lieu-dit ? c'est le nom d'autre chose ?

56972517 over 5 years ago

Bonjour,
il ne semble rien y avoir à cet endroit, qu'est ce que c'est ?

58287193 over 5 years ago

et avec "camping:tents hotel" ?

75162978 over 5 years ago

Hello,
about osm.org/relation/10103376
i'ts associatedStreet with a upper A :)
Regards,
Marc

77272595 over 5 years ago

Hello,
about osm.org/relation/10314892
it's type associatedStreet :)
Regards,
Marc

19869262 over 5 years ago

a never see a survey point at the center of a junction.
Thanks for the info.
type=associatedStreet tag deleted

61103245 over 5 years ago

Hello,

info from first contributor : https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/pLz6ARDyLzQHyurNsx_Z7A

the pic show the sticker on a door, so the power=substation is inside the building.
I moved the node closer to the right wall, add location=indoor tag, added the door, added the barrier and the gate

Regards,
Marc

23741 over 5 years ago

thanks. the pic show the sticker on the door, so it's inside.

53515943 over 5 years ago

the campground with the same name osm.org/node/4735232633
so it's a campground with several pitch area ? I only find one pitch area

61103245 over 5 years ago

Hello,

Are you talking about this one osm.org/node/316021215 ?
the localisation seem to be inside the building. I wrote a message to the initial contributor osm.org/changeset/23741

Regards,
Marc

23741 over 5 years ago

Hello,
about osm.org/node/316021215
Is it in the building? Another contributor can't find him osm.org/changeset/61103245
Regards,
Marc

57083647 over 5 years ago

both at the same location ?
2 objects is better in this case

50088950 over 5 years ago

Hello,

I think 'camp_pitch' is not yet rendered for 3 reasons: 1) nobody coded it yet :) 2) there were 3 different schemas for camp_pitch, it's only last year that 2 schemas were depreciated in favor of the 3rd one. 3) there was a pronounced confusion between a camp_pitch<>camp_site.
It's also to help the rendering that I'm working on correcting as many objects as possible. I hope the rendering will come soon. anyway the number of objects with the old schemas is decreasing dramatically and the confusion rate is decreasing strongly.

I understand the problem of the render disappearing if you fix the error. Some contributors use tourism=camp_site fixme=tag for the render, it's a tourism=camp_site
I understand if you do that even if I won't :)
but at least it allows to reduce the number of camp_site=camp_pitch which is already a first improvement.
if no one wants to convert camp_site=camp_pitch then we get stuck with problems 2 and 3, which gives arguments to the rendering team to postpone it until later

tourism=information + information=signpost is display on osm.org

Regards,
Marc

42236553 over 5 years ago

Hello,
osm.org/node/778779564
you can also remove type£=associatedStreet on the node, it's for relation only
Regards,
Marc

79670351 over 5 years ago

Hello,
osm.org/way/763446441
you have added type=associatedStreet on it, but it's a tag for relation only.
you also have 2x no 203
Regards,
Marc

19869262 over 5 years ago

Hello,
osm.org/node/278443870
is this survey point at the exact junction of those roads ? if not, add a new point.
I also didn't understand why you add a type=associatedStreet on it. it's a tag for relation only.
Regards,
Marc