matt_ellery's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
167039504 | 2 months ago | Hi again FT111, The bollards that you have added aren't rising, because they aren't automatic. osm.wiki/Key:bollard It doesn't seem appropriate to add wheelchair=yes to osm.org/way/185862716, it's a rough stony path, often muddy in the winter, quite undesirable for wheelchair users I would imagine! And the tagging for osm.org/way/249455270 was previously correct for a combined cyleway and footway, which this is. You have removed important information. osm.wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway Please tell me you're not blindly accepting suggestions from Rapid without thinking whether they make sense? |
167082013 | 2 months ago | Hi FT111,
|
160368952 | 8 months ago | There's no need to add details to the old Currys and Office Outlet building as they have been demolished. I'll revert this change. |
160368341 | 8 months ago | Hi ljones56, Unless something has changed, Carfax has a No Entry sign for southbound traffic (except cycles): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=131534852351315&focus=photo&lat=51.062524961300284&lng=-0.3281082310751344&z=16.852768485179972&x=0.47516744226960833&y=0.5942209067282249&zoom=2.5686695278969953 And I believe East Street also has a No Entry sign going east from Market Square. Are you sure these aren't one way? |
159069443 | 9 months ago | Which routing software does this out of interest? Since it ignores the footway tag and two sets of steps (with step counts) when routing bicycles, I want to make sure I avoid using it in the future. |
157512758 | 10 months ago | Hi M4rkle, I couldn't see any indication or signs showing that pedestrians are intended to use the track (not footpath) changed here. What was your intention when adding foot=designated? All the best,
|
156944556 | 11 months ago | See osm.org/changeset/148858813 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/problematic-access-changes-by-microsoft-mappers-in-the-uk/117945/6 |
156428430 | 11 months ago | No response, so I've reverted in osm.org/changeset/156906069 |
156668344 | 11 months ago | Hi Captinmuffin, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for your edits in Southwater. The buildings in this changeset are a little wonky compared to the satellite view, you can make them square by selecting the building, right click, then click the square icon (or use the shortcut Q).
|
144966070 | 11 months ago | Hi Jarv,
|
156428430 | 11 months ago | I agree Jarv, Kilnwood Lane falls short of being an unclassified highway. This changeset should be reverted. @Laura21! if you need help reverting this change then let me know. All the best,
|
148858813 | 12 months ago | I checked way 662637905 this afternoon. It's a private track/driveway, so unclassified is absolutely not correct.
|
155899924 | 12 months ago | Hi Graham, the Aldi building is there, there's no need for the layer tags. If you do a full refresh of your browser's cache (Ctrl+F5/Shift+F5/Ctrl+Shift+R) then you should see it. |
155899924 | 12 months ago | Hi mygrove, you asked for a review. What are you trying to achieve with the layer tag here? The Aldi building osm.org/way/1311800070 looks OK, but you should change building=yes to building=construction (and I suggest then adding construction=supermarket ). This is much preferred to using '(under construction)' in the name - see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things All the best, Matt |
151728757 | about 1 year ago | Yeah, it's not changed. Reverted in osm.org/changeset/151823387 |
151728757 | about 1 year ago | I'm 99% sure that the Bing Street side image hasn't materially changed and I can see no reason why it would have done so. The BUSES ONLY paint on the road is also on the Bing aerial images. I can check tomorrow to make certain. |
150760381 | over 1 year ago | Hi, you requested a review for this change. It looks good to me, well spotted!
|
150336370 | over 1 year ago | Changes made in osm.org/changeset/150661818 I'll try to check the A264 east of Rusper Road too. |
150336370 | over 1 year ago | I think this whole section and the Rusper Road roundabout need a proper review, maxpeeds are all over the place - some holdovers from construction, some that I suspect are just plain wrong. I'll see what I can do over the next week. |
150336370 | over 1 year ago | Westbound is NSL dual here (surveyed today). I'll try to confirm one way or the other eastbound. |