Reverted in changeset 111788075.

@SK53 no, I tried an failed to find anything when the footpath signs were removed. I have re-surveyed today (see also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Downs_Link_fingerpost.jpg) and updated the bridleway tags in changeset 111767131.

Thanks for the research & revert work Jerry.

The way from Railway Cottages under the Arun Valley line was recently converted from a footpath to a bridleway as part of the work to extend the offroad section of the Downs Link (see v5 of osm.org/way/412925868/history - a bridleway fingerpost has been installed since then).

Hi mygrove, thanks for your edits. Adding access=no to a way is only used if the general public are explicitly prohibited, so it's definitely not appropriate for this public bridleway. What were you trying to clarify re: the access?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111666933

hi talkytoaster,
Unfortunately this change has removed a section from the Riverside Walk relation osm.org/relation/3085395
Please can you revert (as it is valid and accepted practice to create pavements as separate ways osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way ) or add the relevant sections of Lemmington Way, Rusper Road, and the roundabout to the RW relation with the correct sidewalk tags.

Hi jaabhil,
Just letting you know that your edits are deleting existing nodes close to the newly mapped ways for seemingly no reason. I've restored the nodes deleted in Horsham this morning.
Thanks,
Matt

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your recent updates to Horsham and Wickhurst Green. Just a note to say that it's good practice to keep & enhance existing elements rather than deleting and replacing them: osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

All the best,
Matt

You beat me to it, I noticed the work had moved on when I was in the area yesterday but I didn't have time to survey it properly. Nice work!

Thanks Jack,
I've put Eversfield House as an alt_name and added a note to help discourage others from reverting your changes in the future.
Matt

Hi jdhaywd,
Thanks for your edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've made a small change to the car parks as they were overlapping with the adjacent buildings.
I'm interested in the name change from Eversfield House to Tilney House. There are signs outside the building that seem to suggest it's Eversfield - is this an outdated name for the building, or do the signs point to a different building?
Thanks,
Matt

Thanks for highlighting, I pasted the values from the OSM wiki as I can never remember the syntax, but I accidentally kept the whole string in the key. The Mo-Fr 16:45; Sa 10:30 value is correct as surveyed. I've fixed the key.

Hi guinius,
Thanks for adding the footpaths. There are a few things in this changeset that look a bit odd, can you check them please?
- Way 620497503 isn't a single building, which is normally what building=house denotes. Last time I passed by College Grove at the start of June is was still under construction, however if it has now finished then landuse=residential would be a better tag to use here.
- You moved the Itchingfield/Southwater boundary (222541882) but OS Boundary-Line still matches the previous placement. Has the boundary actually moved?
- You've used bridge=boardwalk for railway crossings 821860956 and 821860963. I think I can see what you were going for here, but the boardwalk tag is usually used to map a structure on stilts over water, wetlands, or rough terrain.

Hi again,

Please don't change maxpeed values from mph to kph like this. The former maxpeed of 40 mph is what is evident on the ground. 64 kph isn't the same thing.

What program is "ATSR Edit Map"? If you are testing out a new editor then it would be better to use the dev APIs located at https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Hi,

Your changes to the A24 are a little odd. You've changed the maxpeed from 50 mph (which was accurate) to 80 (defaulting to KPH, which is not accurate). Also, the name of the road is not "Dorking Road_1".

What program is "ATSR Edit Map"? If you are testing out a new editor then it would be better to use the dev APIs located at https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Hi AMWS,

Thanks for updating the new section of bridleway. I've surveyed it a few times now but I can't see any evidence of ways 798009790 or 798009791. What was your source for these new ways?

It's not entirely clear on the ground where the bridleway stops and the footpath starts. There's a bridleway fingerpost at the Mill Lane end and a footpath fingerpost at Christ's Hospital. If and when it's clearer it would be good to update the designation, I'll keep it in mind to do this as well.

User has confirmed that changes come from a direct survey.

Hi PB&C and welcome to Openstreetmap!
Thanks for the edits, unfortunately your re-routing the Downslink back to its original position caused a few issues with way 24293643 but I've tidied it up in osm.org/changeset/82437616
You mention in the changeset comment that the edits are based on conveyancing plans. Can you confirm that you've had explicit permission to use these plans as a source?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82430119

Thanks, I've changed the highway tag in changeset 79532771.
Has HDC given permission to use the planning applications in this way?

Hi Thomas, do you have a link to the planning documents? I'd be interested in seeing the details. There's no evidence on the ground yet of the roads, perhaps these should be tagged as highway=proposed for now?