Thanks. I visited today and can confirm it's brownfield, no construction indicated. Now fixed.

Ah, I see you saw construction work at the Bromley-by-Bow gasholders. Do you happen to have any further info on what's going on? The reason I ask is, I was about to edit them to add their Grade II listed status... which has implications for construction work, of course.

Hi - is source=solar a glitch?

Great, thanks Jerry. I've just detected this glitch myself, and was about to ask if the tag was deliberate or not.

Great :) all the best

:) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/05/worlds-first-solar-cycle-lane-opening-in-the-netherlands

Ah the tags are also on this street: osm.org/way/709213184

Hi Tony - thanks for the solar panel edits! I discovered a weird item - there seems to be a street tagged as a solar panel here: osm.org/way/589660896

Perhaps it was a copy and paste error and the tags were supposed to land on some other object nearby?

Hi Djministe - thanks for the solar panel edits! I discovered a weird item - there seems to be a street tagged as a solar panel here: osm.org/way/476353854

Perhaps it was a copy and paste error and the tags were supposed to land on the node that's a little bit to the right of this?

I see some location=yes tags here. Were they perhaps intended to be location=roof?

Thanks for your edits! Be careful - you accidentally pasted some info (from your CV?) into one of the fields. I've fixed this now.

Great work. I've just been travelling around here and I confirmed a lot of the landmarks you've mapped. Thanks!

Hi - thanks Eggie.

Ceasar Sun: you could use "description:cn" instead of "name"

Hi - what is this monument? I visited this exact location in the past month. I did not see a monument here, and definitely not something with a Chinese name. Is this really correct?

Hi - there's quite an odd copy-paste error in these two nodes!

osm.org/node/6844935727

osm.org/node/6844935728

I at first thought it might be spam until I recognised your user ID.

Oops, I should have noticed that the number didn't come from you originally - thanks

Output of "2.0" should be perhaps "2.0 MW"? - On way 404294617

Hi - thanks for doing this. I noticed one error, so just to let you know:
You've tagged the solar farm with plant:output:electricity=* which is not normal, the asterisk should usually be replaced by either the actual capacity (such as "3 MW") or just "yes". I'll update that tag

No. 91 of them are "not seen" or "unsure"

Hi - I'm checking through some solar farms. Thanks for mapping lots, by the way! For this one at Southend, REPD says the capacity of this one is 2.5 MW. Do you know where you got the number of 3 MW from, please?

Online news also says 2.5 MW: https://www.emexlondon.com/london-southend-airports-solar-farm-to-offset-20-percents-of-its-energy-use/