OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
76868542 over 4 years ago

Forgot to say I started viewing through https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76868542 where I reviewed various red to green changes as usally weird on their own after seeing walkway/road at northern end of mall had a weird alignment.

76868542 over 4 years ago

I've noticed around metrocenter mall that there are many small groups of nodes that appear to be relocated; unless trying to realign only a few things based on known offset it looks like a possible move of many unintentional objects. The building northwest of the mall with Chipotle in it had doors moved to building edge which is just a roof and not the wall where I had located them at (shame on me for not finding a good way to represent roof extension that covers part of the walkway). Was there a different reason for the relocations of groups of nodes in this changeset?

73912390 over 5 years ago

Was any of this localknowledge based? Changelog mentions you used Bing aerial imagery which underwent some refreshing in recent months; current imagery doesn't show this here. My localknowledge tells me there is only parking there but I will verify in person if needed.

67283878 about 6 years ago

Not sure who you are or how you were invited to this conversation, but motivation accepted. ^_^ Still left apartment entry as I don't know why it was there. Seems i reached a edit comment limit so I stopped after only minor corrections after a bigger edit. POIs could use addresses, full names (not entirely visible on free street photos I found) and some were missing.

67283878 about 6 years ago

Not sure why there is an apartment tag here. From north to south the east side of the building is a loans place, nails salon, cricket, barber, and then I didn't get a look at the next spot then a vacant spot but didn't look at last two thoroughly. Or just go with your mapillary run on https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=TI1U80M8hBJdnrzRZTenYg&focus=photo&lat=33.58128254366197&lng=-112.1342834112676&z=17 as it looks reasonable per my memory. Those businesses on the right should be able to be on their own split of the building as it is the different address from the Fry's to its left. It was all traced weird anyway. Shall I split and retrace it?

56245882 over 6 years ago

Way: New River Trail (371126043) was changed to layer=-1 when it appears on satellite to be on top of the bridge. should the river be 1 and bridge contents be 2 os is there a reason why it is above ground with a negative number?

53361230 over 6 years ago

Was there any reason why both cycleway=lane and cycleway:right=lane were specified at the same time on east bell road?

67356130 over 6 years ago

I am not sure I understand the no u-turn restriction on the southeast end of 164th where it connects to west sheila lane. There doesn't look to likely be a restricting sign from satellite imagery and I do not find a openstreetcam or mapillary image to reference. Tiger has the name as 'Avenue' instead of 'Avenus' as it is labeled on its connecting piece headed southwest. If this was deleted then recreated to have it as 2 separate pieces, a way can be split so you can place tags on only part of it which leaves a visible history of the object and is important to save a lot of work if you get into refining details that only apply to part of a way. Thanks for the edit and welcome to openstreetmap.

62769077 over 6 years ago

Seen node on the street instead of on a shop. shop=tires should likely be =car_repair or possibly =tyres

51938531 over 6 years ago

I couldn't find any left turn restriction from aerial and skimming some openstreetcam feeds so I removed it. If you know what lead to the conclusion of a turn not being allowed then please let me know so we can see if it was somehow relevant.

66660202 over 6 years ago

On the northeast corner of North 35th Avenue and West Peoria Avenue is a 45 degree angled building relative to the main roads. The Panda Express that was moved inside it likely should not be inside of it and it doesn't exist anymore as that corner was tore up and rebuilt with a building that is aligned to the roads with its own ways. I do not know of any aerial imagery that is updated to it yet.

44857429 over 6 years ago

Parking area (way 121870030) was changed to be oneway=no which I found as a JOSM validator warning. Was that tag intended for an adjacent way and if not, what is its meaning when on a parking area?

60632510 almost 7 years ago

"Filaberto's Mexican Food" looks to be a typo of Filiberto's. I found it when I was researching like POIs when editing way/238110975 and choose the following tags; if you think these would not apply well to either I'd appreciate the feedback.
amenity=fast_food
building=commercial
contact:website=https://filibertos.com
cuisine=mexican
drive_through=yes
name=Filiberto's

59360792 about 7 years ago

Based on the street in the address, this should likely be somewhere 1/4 a mile west. Addresses should not contain any abbreviations. Description looks like an ad; your website is the proper place for that (consider changing link to https). May want to consider craft and opening_hours tags. Need any assistance?

57937004 over 7 years ago

Just started as a goal to only update the Monday to Friday start time change. Tried to keep the edits to just those objects then; feels like what relations should be for though. Will linmit in the future and thanks for the feedback!

57784186 over 7 years ago

I also removed lanes tag from adjacent roads as the wiki describes the tag for marked lanes

44220264 about 8 years ago

is the turn restrictions at north 35th avenue and west lawrence lane correct? Listed as bing and mapillary as sources but I could not see it through those sources or make sense of it. Validating a second turn restriction there too no longer connected to a way is how I found this area.

45467643 over 8 years ago

Comment should have been: added walls

44703139 over 8 years ago

Note was not what i typed for changeset; added parking.

40603519 about 9 years ago

Confusion from learning osm.wiki/Key:traffic%20sign?uselang=en-US perhaps? I'm up for changing to however is appropriate. so *=stop to indicate the type of sign then? Does it still need "traffic_sign=stop" if it has "traffic_sign:forward=stop"? Thanks for helping and perhapse documentation can be changed to give an example of its use?