Please use descriptive changeset comments when you make updates to the map.

Specific to this edit, please note that addr:housenumber should only contain the number - the street name (which should be East 1st Street to match how the street itself is labeled) should be in addr:street

This changeset description is pretty misleading - you updated opening_hours rather than clearing it, and did clear out other fields. I have no issue with the edit itself, but it would be nice if your changeset comments explained what you're changing rather than needing to look in osmcha.

This has been edited a few times, including you undoing edits made by other mappers. Please note that a) the description you keep putting does not belong in OpenStreetMap (osm.wiki/Key:description#No_advertising) and b) street address gets separated into two fields - addr:housenumber has the number, and addr:street has the street. There's some confusion with 23rd Avenue vs North 23rd Avenue, and I left it as North as you put it, but the 216 definitely belongs in addr:housenumber instead of addr:street.

From some exploration, it seems that the team has at least the following members:
* osm.org/user/Mark%20from%20EZRouting
* osm.org/user/EZrouting-Akif

Are there others? Those usernames do match the recommended pattern, but they just should be listed on the team wiki page.

The wiki page says that this is a shared account. Can you update it to reflect that it's actually an individual account now, and list the usernames of the other members of your team? Ideally the other members of your team should be using usernames of the form something_ezrouting.

Another 12 days have passed and EZRouting is *still* using a single shared account with no wiki page.

The main tag to use is building=cabin. I think it's reasonable to include building:use=hotel in addition though.

Two other suggestions I'd make:
1) Square the shape of the cabins as you're drawing them. On most editors that's done by hitting Q. On Vespucci, "To square a polygon, select it then choose “square way” under the “More options” icon."
2) It looks like the Lake Trail is mapped in a way that doesn't match the imagery. If you're on site, can you see where it actually goes and update it accordingly?

If it's a mistake, do you intend to fix it?

Hi there! This changeset added a bunch of good tags to parking lots, but you also added some parking lots that already existed. I removed those in osm.org/changeset/138401514 - please be sure to check whether a feature exists before adding it.

Specific to this changeset - it's unusual (but not impossible) that the last stretch of the road is both a driveway and also still named Rowan Street. I'd expect that either it's a privately owned (nameless) driveway to the last two houses, or it's a municipal street in which case it should probably be a residential road rather than driveway. Do you have evidence for the specific way that you tagged it?

What does ".json data file" mean in the imagery_used tag on this (and all your other) changeset? What is that file, and where does its data come from?

This discussion was 4 months ago and you're still using this shared account for numerous edits.

This changeset moved a node of a road several blocks from where the road actually goes. Reverted in osm.org/changeset/138400227
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138152089

FYI it appears you're importing some duplicate buildings - e.g. osm.org/way/1172900933 and osm.org/way/1174183647

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/137964748

Whoops, that comment was intended for the original changesets not the revert

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/137964748

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/137964748

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/137964748

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/137964748