Hello. Do you remember what the 7=12 at osm.org/way/1311602054 meant? A house number? Building size?

Are you sure there is a playground on top of a train line? osm.wiki/FR:Key:playground#Parties_de_structures_d'aires_de_jeux

I'm glad I asked. I see another mapper removed the 'yes=no' a couple of hours ago without replacement so that piece of information would've been lost. I made the edit now. Thanks a lot!

Do you remember if osm.org/way/1310655962 is a oneway street (section)? Currently the tag is "yes=no". Based on the map I'd say yes. It came up on a validation tool (https://osm.janmichel.eu/taginfo/newkeys.htm)

Hello wiemzayati,

Was is the data source for
osm.org/way/1310648624 ? What does the id and the 20 tags mean? Is that an import (osm.wiki/FR:Import) with more information?

thank you

Do you remember if osm.org/node/12122850157 was a waste=dog_excrement (osm.wiki/Tag%3Awaste%3Ddog_excrement) maybe?

Hello. osm.org/way/127453562 contains "Chiosco Cairoli di Alice Marani" in addr:postcode. Is that the name of the building? Or maybe another building? Online I see it might be the name of a flower shop booth but I can't recognize a booth on the imagery.

Hello
Thank you for adding the clinic to the OpenStreetMap database.
Can you correct the wikipedia and wikidata tag? If the place doesn't have a wikipedia page it can be deleted. Can you add the zip code (currently it's set to the city name)?
All the best

Leider nein, waren dort auch nur auf einer Tagestour und sind einer Komoot Route gefolgt.

Ich habe die access Tags der Brücke jetzt auf 'no' gesetzt. Ist sicher nur temporär, der Rest des Weges ist ok.

I assume the value of addr:postcode was some kind of copy&paste error? Or should that go into a 'note' or 'source' field?

Is the "I’ve got isolates: 1 = 105 2 = 490 3 = 461B 4 = 514 5 = 511" a copy&paste mistake? Affects 4 buildings https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=18.66/51.39/-2.40&layer=postcode_bad_format

Hello fellow mapper. How did you determine a house number and postcode for a dog park? I mean parks usually don't have addresses. Is 302 BiSovent Street for the community center real or made up?

Please give other users a good changeset comment. A dot '.' is telling us very little. Even 'batiment' is not telling us what you aimed to change.

Do you know the address of this place? "n/a" is not helpful and I can't find it listed the website. Is this a business people can visit?

Worth a try. Setting it now. Let me know (or revert) if you see rendering breaking.

I use a regular report based on https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=4.15/43.18/-89.07&layer=postcode_bad_format and I would've noticed if many masts had wrong (not 5 or 5+4 digits) format. No need to go through your edit history.

I reverted this changeset now. Still not sure how to solve it.

It's more related to universities which have many buildings across a larger area. There is a discussion in https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/discussions/3418#discussioncomment-9379380 (where I argue the same: there's already a boundary=site in another relation and this one should probably be a multipolygon again). I have no objection to revert.

For node 147621678, is "2112206" another type of identifier? It's not a postcode, those would be in the 523xx range around this area.