Good to see some more builings being added. Shop, pub and other way outllines still need "building=yes" otherwise they won't render.

Not very clear why the park and fence are now railway abandoned?

Note there's a FIXME on the apex that indicating that the road should "continue"

Did you survey this?

I think the road you've changed is one of two that are part of the entrance to an underground carpark?

Better to add a note or a FIXME?

Did you survey this?

I think it's a bad idea to treat private roads as impossible -- often there's a direction indicator on the public highway -- but without clear satellite imagery it can't be completely mapped. Better to add a note or a FIXME.

This sounds like you are using data from other sources: Ordnance Survey / Google Earth -- OSM doesn't allow copying.

You haven't added tags to 358540486 - so it's still incomplete

Cheers for adding the building tag back -- and have fun with more mapping

Why did you delete "building=yes" -- Cabot Tower is no longer being rendered.

Changing it to building=tower I could understand :-)

You added a way without any tags -- would be a shame to lose any info.

Noticed you added a long way here with no tags?

OSM we should map the world as it is -- this is signed as the Hilton Bristol -- checked as I was driving past tonight. Or change the sign :-)

Comment could be more descriptive -- looks more like a speed limit change and adding "foot=yes".

I'm not sure about the "foot=yes" access tag. There's always "sidewalk = left/right/both" might be less "legal" -- unless it really is a designated footpath?

I think it would better to remove the name -- it's confusing as the road's the Portway and even then it's not the whole length of the cycle track as you've marked it.

I'll have a quick check on the w/end but I'm pretty sure that there's no signage indicating the cyclepath as Portway either?

The comment doesn't really make it clear what's been fixed -- not many tigers or deltas in Eastville.

The previous name was as surveyed -- Wikipedia is not the standard -- please revert this.

Note a quick search would have found https://www.flickr.com/photos/51321219@N02/9656442109/

No, they're only 20mph if signposted (30 mph roads don't have 30mph signs -- except on a boundary with a 20 mph one). The official ruling would be BCC traffic orders http://www.bristol.gov.uk/page/transport-and-streets/traffic-regulation-orders-tros but they probably don't have a good copyright to mix with OSM, so back to signposts it is :-)

My bad -- disregard the above

Was the postbox in the wrong place? http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/2/map.html?lat=51.458869&lon=-2.619061&zoom=13 seemed to have it as a good match?

I had a feeling that the oneway didn't apply right at the Gloucester Road end? So the flats could get to their parking?