OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
55813974 over 7 years ago

Hopefully, I've managed to add this back.
Is there a duplicate, or a copy/paste function in iD you could use to get the bus stop on a separate node next time.

55668034 over 7 years ago

Must admit I wondered about that originally -- but then https://techspark.co/bristol-based-yogscast-share-how-to-reach-7b-views-on-youtube/ -- so that's why it has "level=4". I'll let someone else do the whole multi-level mapping for the other levels :-)

If it's the building name, then surely it should be addr:housename.

55668034 over 7 years ago

Not sure why this is an improvement? It's handy to have yogscast mapped as they run meetups in Bristol. The housename's already mapped. If you want to map the other building levels then please do so without disturbing what's already there.

55658804 over 7 years ago

Did you survey this? The lane is clearly oneway on Bing -- it looks like an obvious ramp to the top of a multi-storey carpark. If you think it needs an on-the-ground survey, then just add a note to the map for local mappers, rather than removing tags.

55559309 over 7 years ago

Can't see why a war memorial and a building should be labelled "leisure=park" they are already inside it.

55225336 over 7 years ago

osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground

Suggests leisure=recreation_ground should be removed?

55191504 over 7 years ago

I've partially reverted this -- if it's now a house, then there's no need to delete the whole building.

55054116 over 7 years ago

Confused where this is supposed to be -- it's not on a pitch/pavilion?

54993490 over 7 years ago

The whole point was to keep the name rendered -- if it still has external signage.

I note that osm.wiki/Key:disused: doesn't mention disused:name -- are you it's still searchable?

54994782 over 7 years ago

I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information.

Can't remember if they've taken down the signs on this one.

54993490 over 7 years ago

I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information.

54799786 over 7 years ago

Ok, I'll revert it this evening.

54761082 over 7 years ago

Changing values is ok -- even if it provokes a discussion :-)

It's definitely better than just deleting the "wrong" one and trying to add a new corrected version.

54799786 over 7 years ago

You've just deleted the copyshop and moved the "odd" yog towers inside the other building -- not sure how this has improved the correctness of the mapping.

54761584 over 7 years ago

Probably shop=bakery would be better? Or add extra amenity=cafe too -- and hope data consumers can cope :-)

54761082 over 7 years ago

Depends :-)

Could add amenity=cafe -- or just take rely on the precedence implicit in the name, i.e. "Beer + Coffee" rather than "Coffee + Beer".

54772187 over 7 years ago

Pizzarova is already present -- and separate :-)

Added in the Cargo2 extension when it was empty. Have surveyed on foot -- but currently in my backlog of stuff todo.

54745484 over 7 years ago

Modified so buildings aren't grown incorrectly by including the front walls.

54709431 over 7 years ago

It's probably a pain in all editors -- I generally delete "middle" walls and then combine remaining ones.

I'll stick a note on the main map as a reminder for later work.

54708498 over 7 years ago

The name on the outside of the shop should be the name in OSM.

Leaving stale data is probably not a great idea -- I'd tend to delete it -- but some people just add "old_" to the start of the tag names.