Ideally you could connect the path to the road - otherwise routing won't work.

Strange opening hours for an ATM?

There's no changeset comment -- what was the motivation here?

There's definitely a few questionable decisions. Was it surveyed on foot?

Not clear why you've marked a lot of these roads residential -- most of them are in the shopping centres and unclassified seems to be the more valid choice.

"edits" is not a helpful changeset comment -- more detail would be appreciated.

Not clear why you've marked a lot of these roads residential -- most of them are in the shopping centres and unclassified seems to be the more valid choice.

"edits" is not a helpful changeset comment -- more detail would be appreciated.

No worries have tweaked the school area - hope it's ok.

Maybe you could add highway=pedestrian too?

If it's not inside the school then that might also need adjustment?

Thanks for the update -- I'll merge the new information with the already mapped building "Hanham Flooring" Centre.

A number of "spam" notes have been added to Bristol in the past.

I would expect even if arm chair mapping it would be advisable to check mapilliary or other open sources -- otherwise you can't determine whether the "office" occupies the whole building, or is simply a mail address in an appartment block.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground

Was there clear external signage when you surveyed this?

There's another Wallscote Park locality place node here osm.org/node/1934227918#map=17/51.49785/-2.55455 Maybe it needs moving.

This is already mapped as a landuse area.

Looking a lot better now.

My recollection is that there is signage for the area near the hotel that states it's a pedestrian area/zone. If so, then it'll need updating somehow.

[[ I added a photo to the other unrelated changeset that hints that vehicle access should be possible to/from the gate if/when it's unlocked. The change in paving for the path in/out gives credence to that. At least there should a footway. ]]

Signs are on 2 posts near the two junctions with Park Street. At the very least it should be designated=pedestrian. Vehicles are allowed in highway=pedestrian, hence the original tagging.

Something seems to have gone wrong here. It would be good if you can fix it.

From what I can tell:

1). College Green is now paved.

2). Lord Mayor's Chapel seems to be askew with bike parking inside?

3). Pedestrian Zone (which is signposted as such -- but not necessarily obvious) now changed to service roads near Royal Marriott Hotel.

I recommend ESRI clarity layer -- it's the same as the old Bing layer and much clearer (if a little out of date) -- as explained on the Bristol wiki page.

Paving is different for the service road than the rest of the pavement -- it can clearly be used to get cars in/out -- even if only in an emergency.

Please revert, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/27389948628/in/dateposted-public/

You don't need to name every house "house".

The school doesn't need naming -- it's already inside an "amenity=school" with the correct name -- as indicated on the wiki page.

https://www.yha.org.uk/ has "© 2017 YHA (England & Wales)". Like OpenStreetmap has "© OpenStreetMap contributors". If you believe the second is important -- then so is the first.

Anyway, If there's agreement on the mailing list then there's less likelihood of changes being reverted.