ndm's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
79582860 | over 5 years ago | Mostly reverted in osm.org/changeset/79621483 |
79584491 | over 5 years ago | Looking on Bing Streetside:
|
79582860 | over 5 years ago | Did you check these -- the N Bristol one still had signage visible yesterday -- please revert your change. |
79513472 | over 5 years ago | Looks like you can never leave? |
79514574 | over 5 years ago | I've removed a service road segment that doesn't appear to exist. |
79497972 | over 5 years ago | This turn restriction is incorrect -- it has been reverted. |
79259503 | over 5 years ago | This looks like it needs to be reverted -- should be using ESRI clarity as specified in the Bristol wiki entry -- previous data was a better fit to the middle lane. |
79260663 | over 5 years ago | This probably needs reverted -- a motorway juntion tag has been deleted -- and roads should really be split where they are physically separate. |
79142564 | over 5 years ago | There's no service road here https://binged.it/37zxuwu -- I'll revert. If you meant to add a driveway -- then it was either too long or misaligned, depending on which house it was supposed to be associated with. |
79080507 | over 5 years ago | Adjusted -- as there is no "no-left-turn" restriction. |
79081226 | over 5 years ago | Please don't glue areas to ways it makes it difficult to modify in the future. |
79086061 | over 5 years ago | Reverting this -- access was previously correct. |
79075124 | over 5 years ago | Please don't mark access to shops as private -- it should be customers. |
79008246 | over 5 years ago | I've removed the service road that doesn't exist you added to McDonalds - you should be able to see that on Bing Streetside. Surely customers need to have access to Toyota. |
65343167 | over 5 years ago | Thanks for the update. Looked like some parallax / image misalignment. Maybe really needs some judicious use of layer / level tags then? Or split parking into covered and uncovered. |
77348570 | over 5 years ago | |
77348570 | over 5 years ago | The access=private I added is correct -- I've removed the pre-existing tag that seems to confuse you. And added a note that access on the other bridge needs checking too. Basically, the area over the stream is supposed to be only for authorised personnel (as much as I can tell from seeing one bridge). |
78885116 | over 5 years ago | Is it wise to add service roads to an area under construction? |
78786460 | over 5 years ago | I've removed the through road to Moorlands Road -- clearly not present on Bing Streetside. |
78598746 | over 5 years ago | This signpost is already marked osm.org/node/6985964877 |