OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
81402805 over 5 years ago

I've reverted this -- please don't glue unrelated items such as highways and landuses items together it makes editting much more difficult.

81421392 over 5 years ago

Don't believe that Driveway or "foot path" are their real names -- best not to invent them.

81379126 over 5 years ago

Please add back all the footways and cycleways -- they were carefully surveyed.

81318036 over 5 years ago

Needs a proper survey.

Mapillary is from Feb 4th so it's newer -- and obviosuly has a copyright that is compatible with OSM, rather than the Highways Agency photo.

Possible footpath might come out at: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.54172013435701&lng=-2.6328473485604604&z=17&pKey=LJOi-8YeiRxQmGT0wBGN8A&focus=photo&x=0.5080508187494617&y=0.5402772628314706&zoom=0

81318036 over 5 years ago

Scrub that -- forgot cyclepath is separated.

81318036 over 5 years ago

There's no reason cyclists can't use the roundabout --- access=no seems a bit harsh

81318036 over 5 years ago

There was still a connection to farm lane two weeks ago -- even if it was subject to construction/barriers https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.54277175163148&lng=-2.6352815071017273&z=17&pKey=k-QaQtALdsyqoOecllSK5A&focus=photo&x=0.5062408917637296&y=0.5099147984565611&zoom=0.00021216568154376267

80803209 over 5 years ago

Reverted problematic edits

80803325 over 5 years ago

Reverted problematic edits.

80803418 over 5 years ago

Reverted problematic edits.

80664025 over 5 years ago

Fixed the easy gap. Don't know about the one near Amazon -- deleted the "temporary path (construction works), not visible on Bing" -- which is no longer there, see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1lJw5srlLPaou8K4IqvFIQ

Can't help much more -- it's right on the limit for a lunchtime wander

80803209 over 5 years ago

A lot of the map is drawn from different imagery -- some of it is no longer available -- all has varying quality and offsets and parallax issues. Some mappers draw "to the roofs" -- some to the ground -- if there's no parallax there's no difference -- but can be significant if parallax is present.

If you're looking at an area that's already been mapped then aligning imagery to what's already present (maybe multiple times) can reduce the number of changes.

If you're determined to move stuff then consider all connected items -- just moving a subset can cause problems.

See how it's rendered after the changes. Fix it if you break it -- or undo it -- or ask for help.

80803418 over 5 years ago

Rest is probably ok.

80803418 over 5 years ago

osm.org/way/471983747 -- probably not a square building -- doesn't match ESRI clarity

80803418 over 5 years ago

There's a bad drag of osm.org/way/496196928 -- don't think alll the nodes got moved -- original probably nearer ground truth, paralax in imagery.

80803325 over 5 years ago

Other changes look harmless / useful cleanup.

80803325 over 5 years ago

osm.org/way/625567210#map=19/51.46729/-2.57694 no longer matches ESRI clarity

80803325 over 5 years ago

osm.org/way/564470886#map=19/51.46989/-2.58089 no longer has a smooth wall/street

80803325 over 5 years ago

osm.org/way/668771054#map=19/51.46700/-2.58378 no longer has a smooth wall/street

80803325 over 5 years ago

osm.org/way/618601186#map=19/51.46612/-2.58457 no longer matches ESRI clarity