You've added the oneway in error.

Might be stylistic -- but if you want to draw hedges / walls / kerbs / sidewalks it's easier if they aren't connected. I think a lot of the landuse round Bristol is done that way -- maybe it's an unwritten rule to copy the local mapping style :-)

*Please* don't join landuse to highways -- it makes editing so much harder and means that you can't easily add kerbs, sidewalks, etc.

Good luck with your future edits -- the centre of Bristol might not be the easiest place to start.

The changeset comment makes little sense -- a bay from the bus station got dragged across the road to the South Plaza -- have reverted this and the other minor changes.

Modified tagging to use lifecycle prefix, i.e. disused:amenity

Changeset comment is useless -- what were you trying to add?

Huge changeset?

I've reverted the powerline you moved in Dorset - it was clearly visible in ESRI clarity at the original position

Should be "oneway:bicycle = no".
It'll take several days until routing engines pick it up.

Think most named cycleroutes are done as relations.

Presume you're not copying maps from that link?

Remote mappers make a lot of mistakes, even Amazon ones -- I check all edits in my local neighbourhood -- anything that's not correct will get reverted / modified.

If I can't use the same imagery then this will likely happen again.

I have always been able to respond to other mappers with a data source to back up my edits (even when they were wrong :-) ) -- if you are contributing to an open project, then you should really be able to do the same.

Please feel free to add an OSM note for a local mapper to check the area.

This looks more like a footway -- are you sure this is a service road?

Bother!

The edit is perfect with regards to Maxar imagery licenced for OpenStreetMap - if you have other imagery licenced for OpenStreetMap, please make it available.

Please make smaller changes

If you are sure, then you should have removed the construction=tertiary tag -- I am a little bit doubtful it's open, as it was basically a dirt track in February, as you can see from the Mapillary images.

Updated based on public Maxar Imagery

Unless you have a better mechanism to communicate with mappers in the locality that your changes are "best effort" and not from a survey, then I think you need to add a note, especially where the situation is ambiguous.

Unless you have a better mechanism to communicate with mappers in the locality that your changes are "best effort" and not from a survey, then I think you need to add a note.

For example, is the path really called "Robin Place" -- is it signed, or left from some previous changed edit.

If you are changing the map based on incomplete data you should at least add a Map Note (note+ icon on the website) so that local mappers know that it needs a detailed survey!

I will have another look at new ESRI imagery -- and will revert if there are cars facing in different directions.

If you are changing the map based on incomplete data you should at least add a Map Note (note+ icon on the website) so that local mappers know that it needs a detailed survey!

I'm going to review satellite imagery and will probably edit osm.org/way/780235136