Had to tweak it a tad -- both lanes were bus only.

Are you sure this is correct? Buses on separated bus lane can no longer enter the roundabout. A changeset comment would be good too. Thanks.

Are you sure this is correct? I thought that the whole point was that cyclists don't need to enter the roundabout -- check it out on Bing. A "Fixing roundabouts" changeset comment would've been really useful too. Cheers.

Are you sure that the preschool really takes up all that area?

I'm more upset that my wikipedia link insn't on the new location :-(

/the data source you're using isn't great I can see houses joined together that should be separate and separate buildings that should be joined together. You'll get better results tracing from Bing.

Hi Matt, rejigged your edit -- addresses won't get rendered visibly -- hope it's reasonable, if not let me know, or give it a tweak.

Layer -1?

Is it really disused -- are the rails visible?

I'm sure you're keen for feedback:

The school (building) was already mapped and named -- this wasn't "fixed".leading to duplication?

There was no need for the school area to be a multipolygon

The school multipolygon was inaccurate and overlapped theresidential multipolygon and would have been better to avoid that.

On the plus side, I've ended up guessing the boundary between the junior and infant school.

Why did you mark the area as industrial -- it's being redeveloped which is why it was marked as construction, as a hint not to use aerial imagery to draw buildings.

Have redrawn junction after making a lot of notes onsite -- some items were duplicated and some (especially "U-turn lanes" were missing).

This looks like a duplicate, albeit with different postcode and minor differences.
Maps.me won't show until a new data download becomes available -- osm.wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits

I've added back the footpath you deleted -- no worries.

FYI the moved node is: osm.org/node/1003112566#map=18/51.45025/-2.52039 -- I'll move it back based on Bing if that's ok.

I think you meant addr:housename not addr:housenumber and Depot not Depo?

You seem to have accidentally moved a node on Church Road?

If it's Edward the 8th -- you could mark it with royal_cypher=EVIII. Easier to parse programmatically, than a description. See osm.wiki/Key:royal_cypher

Has the "private road" sign been taken down? If not, then it should be marked as private.

Not clear how deleting the names from the driveway improves OpenStreetmap -- maybe replacing the & with a ; might have been better. Or adding a note for local mappers.

Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment.

Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment.