OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
45823845 over 8 years ago

I don't think area on it's own will show much?

45654614 over 8 years ago

Interested in where you got open data from Bristol City Council on 20 mph limits with a good licence for OSM? Since this isn't from a survey, perhaps there should be a source:maxspeed tag as well?

45628300 over 8 years ago

This changeset looks strange and the pokemon comment suspicious - can someone local check?

45434736 over 8 years ago

The way you've tagged with "water" is part of a multipolygon relation which has an inside and an outside, see osm.org/relation/1250536. The relation is marked as "dock" which is probably closer to a floating harbour than "just water".

I expect that this change will probably have to be reverted, along with osm.org/changeset/45435219.

I'd recommend starting with smallish changes -- I still remember deleting half an A-road, luckily no one noticed :-)

45164183 over 8 years ago

I was finishing up an edit on this road -- and found a couple of relevant photos. Have updated the name.

45164183 over 8 years ago

Not a description - it is a prominent name in addition to logos/branding. I have added a note that the name needs to be (re)surveyed. Could you please add such notes in the future; unless you've directly surveyed it.

45100512 over 8 years ago

Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.

45193301 over 8 years ago

Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.

44241074 over 8 years ago

I thought it was mapped fairly well. I note it doesn't align with Bing -- and there's no way for motorbikes to turn into Emma-Chris way now -- which I'm pretty sure that they are allowed to. Did you survey this?

44242482 over 8 years ago

Not sure what "foot access" has to do with this change. It just seems to lose information about switching lanes. Bing imagery is out of date -- and I thought it was mapped fairly well. Did you survey this?

43725167 over 8 years ago

Great to see someone else adding stuff -- I tweaked your edit a tiny bit -- no point in calling a tree "Tree".

43725183 over 8 years ago

No worries, added back the tags.

43725183 over 8 years ago

It's usually better to remodel buildings by splitting them, rather than deleting and creating two new ones -- a number of tags on the Greggs (not Gregs) have been lost.

43731920 over 8 years ago

Are you sure about the changes to the junction near "The Cross Hands" -- especially which roads can turn to/from "Lawn Road". A quick check on Bing looks closer to the previous layout -- especially the now deleted traffic islands.

43714188 over 8 years ago

H M Prison (Bristol) is already mapped

42832506 almost 9 years ago

Please don't duplicate existing data - in an incorrect location

42739747 almost 9 years ago

Is planning data licenced appropriately so it can be used for OSM?

42136443 almost 9 years ago

Thisi is just a sympathetic cleanup of Changesets 42119601 and 42124023 -- which added a new industrial area and an untagged way that was roughly the same size atop the original larger industrial area. As it happens I've done some mapping here -- by no means is it a recycling facility -- more a compNY vehicle compound or similar.

41800048 almost 9 years ago

Wow you've viisited a lot of pubs. Not convinced about this change tho' it's definitely "The Pot At Wot" on the pub sign.

41717216 almost 9 years ago

Well, it's being redeveloped so will need resurveying soon. P.S. I use JOSM, so it remembers a last set of changeset comments -- but a simple text file and copy/paste would do the same for other editors -- a pain the first time, but not for subsequent edits.