Can't beat local knowledge -- may still have to get a beer tho'.

Ok, I liked my version better :-) From ESRI(Clarity) The Golden Lion looks like there should be some sort of beer garden? And area behind Joes Bakery looks more like a courtyard? May have to buy a pint and answer at least one of those questions soon :-)

Is that garages / house missing next to Clevedon Road#1?

Split?

Trying to understand how this improves things -- I can see the postal_code has been removed (which is on all Bristol roadsigns) -- and connectivity is probably different now.

So this was mapped really carefully previously -- did you survey this on foot? There are no-entry signs at either end -- there is no other signage. So, that doesn't stop cyclists entering in the middle of the road from the footpath and exiting (potentially from either end) -- many regularly exit onto the A38. To a certain extent "access=no" also messes up the routing for pedestrians too. Maybe you could reconsider your changes.

access:motor_vehicle=no?

presume you can still walk down it?

If all your edits are based on Pathetic Motorways (All media on this website is © Pathetic Motorways, except where noted that they are copyright of a contributor.
Please do not copy without permission.) then I think they will all have to be reverted.

If all your edits are based on Pathetic Motorways (All media on this website is © Pathetic Motorways, except where noted that they are copyright of a contributor.
Please do not copy without permission.) then I think they will all have to be reverted.

Never spotted it -- might have to investigate :-)

I generally break the highway at the edge of the building and use "building passage" in JOSM -- which I think adds "tunnel=building_passage". But there might be better ways?

There's a footpath going through a couple of buildings now -- is that a corridor or building passage or a gap?

Surveyed this tonight -- there's no evidence for the A4 before the junction -- there's only a sign that the A4 is down Anchor Road. I'm minded to revert this especially as there's a mix of A38 and A4 now -- what are you using as your data source.

A changeset comment would have been helpful too :-)

Comments would be greatly appreciated.

This is an automated edit that hasn't been agreed I'll revert this in due course and any others that affect local sites. There's no attempt to keep information in old_name or disused: name. Sites with signage should still have name, but I'm assuming you haven't bothered to survey them.

Something's broken the rendering -- Wiki says use "With leisure=track when tagging the track" ?

Great to see some new houses being added -- even better to get housenumbers.

If it's possible (and I know it's not always clear) could you add the street too -- makes it lot more useful for navigating. E.g. OsmAnd shows all housenumbers it "knows" when you pick a street, so it can route you to the door :-)

I think that there are some strange new values for foot:

osm.org/way/158410912
osm.org/way/49205083
osm.org/way/172439218

might be others?

Great (thought it might be a bad GPS location :-)

Is it a boat?

Is the road named? Should it really be residential not service?