OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
65542846 over 6 years ago

Are you sure osm.org/way/655566640 is a loop?

65536987 over 6 years ago

This seems odd - Bing streetside doesn't show Bishop Monk Avenue -- how did you get to see the barriers. Also imagery seems to be 6 years old -- there seem to be new houses and roads here on OSM not on Bing.

65542263 over 6 years ago

In bing the service road looks like it's drawn through parking spaces.

65542783 over 6 years ago

This is 2 adjacent driveways, not one service road.

65425340 over 6 years ago

I've added a note that this needs an on the ground survey

65423148 over 6 years ago

Bad idea to encourage motorists to use this junction it's bus only!

65425340 over 6 years ago

What's the source of this "correction"? Was it surveyed on the ground?

65343167 over 6 years ago

Going to tweak some of this -- parks are glued to paths that they shouldn't be -- and I assume the car park shouldn't go through the building?

65293791 over 6 years ago

Numbering looks a bit odd on Upton Road -- did you check it on foot?

65290023 over 6 years ago

Note: most buildings in Bristol are drawn using ESRI clarity -- unfortunately, in the last week or so, that's become a lot fainter with some different shifts. The original stuff was a lot clearer and more accurate -- so may be better to if buildings aren't aligned with your imagery to change the imagery offset in JOSM, rather than moving all the buildings.

65138864 over 6 years ago

wetland=tidalflat only seems to be defined for salt water - so fine for estuary, but not really for a river (or change the wiki)? Maybe add: tidal=yes, surface=mud too?

65138864 over 6 years ago

Geometry's great -- just need to find a better way of tagging the tidal river -- osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland doesn't seem to be right. There's just mud in most of the river, no special wetland vegetation as seems to be required. Maybe the talk-GB or tagging lists will have some good ideas if you ask.

65084379 over 6 years ago

Bother -- tweked it to match 2012 Bing Streetside and old ESRI imagery - using original polygon (to keep the history). Might dig out my 2017 photos if I can find them to verify.

64936196 over 6 years ago

This has been reverted. There are no "no right turn" signs visible in Bing streetside -- contrary to the misleading changeset comment.

If you want to stop routing around the island you may need to fix your router to avoid sharp turns.

64892121 over 6 years ago

Bing streetside doesn't show any u-turn restrictions -- is there any reason this shouldn't be reverted?

64829953 over 6 years ago

You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back.

64830019 over 6 years ago

You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back.

64755326 over 6 years ago

I'll keep an eye on it -- sometimes rendering takes a while to catch up -- plus all browser caching too. Fingers crossed :-)

64631931 over 6 years ago

TBH if there is no path, then I wouldn't draw one.

Maybe have a look at the access page osm.wiki/Key:access -- probably has better explanations that I can do.

64672712 over 6 years ago

I notice you've joined the landuse (multipolygons) to the road(s) -- it's great in theory, but in practice just makes it harder to edit -- every time you adjust a road you end up changing the huge area that the relation covers, and that's more likely to conflict with other mappers.