ndm's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
65542846 | over 6 years ago | Are you sure osm.org/way/655566640 is a loop? |
65536987 | over 6 years ago | This seems odd - Bing streetside doesn't show Bishop Monk Avenue -- how did you get to see the barriers. Also imagery seems to be 6 years old -- there seem to be new houses and roads here on OSM not on Bing. |
65542263 | over 6 years ago | In bing the service road looks like it's drawn through parking spaces. |
65542783 | over 6 years ago | This is 2 adjacent driveways, not one service road. |
65425340 | over 6 years ago | I've added a note that this needs an on the ground survey |
65423148 | over 6 years ago | Bad idea to encourage motorists to use this junction it's bus only! |
65425340 | over 6 years ago | What's the source of this "correction"? Was it surveyed on the ground? |
65343167 | over 6 years ago | Going to tweak some of this -- parks are glued to paths that they shouldn't be -- and I assume the car park shouldn't go through the building? |
65293791 | over 6 years ago | Numbering looks a bit odd on Upton Road -- did you check it on foot? |
65290023 | over 6 years ago | Note: most buildings in Bristol are drawn using ESRI clarity -- unfortunately, in the last week or so, that's become a lot fainter with some different shifts. The original stuff was a lot clearer and more accurate -- so may be better to if buildings aren't aligned with your imagery to change the imagery offset in JOSM, rather than moving all the buildings. |
65138864 | over 6 years ago | wetland=tidalflat only seems to be defined for salt water - so fine for estuary, but not really for a river (or change the wiki)? Maybe add: tidal=yes, surface=mud too? |
65138864 | over 6 years ago | Geometry's great -- just need to find a better way of tagging the tidal river -- osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland doesn't seem to be right. There's just mud in most of the river, no special wetland vegetation as seems to be required. Maybe the talk-GB or tagging lists will have some good ideas if you ask. |
65084379 | over 6 years ago | Bother -- tweked it to match 2012 Bing Streetside and old ESRI imagery - using original polygon (to keep the history). Might dig out my 2017 photos if I can find them to verify. |
64936196 | over 6 years ago | This has been reverted. There are no "no right turn" signs visible in Bing streetside -- contrary to the misleading changeset comment. If you want to stop routing around the island you may need to fix your router to avoid sharp turns. |
64892121 | over 6 years ago | Bing streetside doesn't show any u-turn restrictions -- is there any reason this shouldn't be reverted? |
64829953 | over 6 years ago | You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back. |
64830019 | over 6 years ago | You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back. |
64755326 | over 6 years ago | I'll keep an eye on it -- sometimes rendering takes a while to catch up -- plus all browser caching too. Fingers crossed :-) |
64631931 | over 6 years ago | TBH if there is no path, then I wouldn't draw one. Maybe have a look at the access page osm.wiki/Key:access -- probably has better explanations that I can do. |
64672712 | over 6 years ago | I notice you've joined the landuse (multipolygons) to the road(s) -- it's great in theory, but in practice just makes it harder to edit -- every time you adjust a road you end up changing the huge area that the relation covers, and that's more likely to conflict with other mappers. |