ndm's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
81402805 | over 5 years ago | I've reverted this -- please don't glue unrelated items such as highways and landuses items together it makes editting much more difficult. |
81421392 | over 5 years ago | Don't believe that Driveway or "foot path" are their real names -- best not to invent them. |
81379126 | over 5 years ago | Please add back all the footways and cycleways -- they were carefully surveyed. |
81318036 | over 5 years ago | Needs a proper survey. Mapillary is from Feb 4th so it's newer -- and obviosuly has a copyright that is compatible with OSM, rather than the Highways Agency photo. Possible footpath might come out at: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.54172013435701&lng=-2.6328473485604604&z=17&pKey=LJOi-8YeiRxQmGT0wBGN8A&focus=photo&x=0.5080508187494617&y=0.5402772628314706&zoom=0 |
81318036 | over 5 years ago | Scrub that -- forgot cyclepath is separated. |
81318036 | over 5 years ago | There's no reason cyclists can't use the roundabout --- access=no seems a bit harsh |
81318036 | over 5 years ago | There was still a connection to farm lane two weeks ago -- even if it was subject to construction/barriers https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.54277175163148&lng=-2.6352815071017273&z=17&pKey=k-QaQtALdsyqoOecllSK5A&focus=photo&x=0.5062408917637296&y=0.5099147984565611&zoom=0.00021216568154376267 |
80803209 | over 5 years ago | Reverted problematic edits |
80803325 | over 5 years ago | Reverted problematic edits. |
80803418 | over 5 years ago | Reverted problematic edits. |
80664025 | over 5 years ago | Fixed the easy gap. Don't know about the one near Amazon -- deleted the "temporary path (construction works), not visible on Bing" -- which is no longer there, see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1lJw5srlLPaou8K4IqvFIQ Can't help much more -- it's right on the limit for a lunchtime wander |
80803209 | over 5 years ago | A lot of the map is drawn from different imagery -- some of it is no longer available -- all has varying quality and offsets and parallax issues. Some mappers draw "to the roofs" -- some to the ground -- if there's no parallax there's no difference -- but can be significant if parallax is present. If you're looking at an area that's already been mapped then aligning imagery to what's already present (maybe multiple times) can reduce the number of changes. If you're determined to move stuff then consider all connected items -- just moving a subset can cause problems. See how it's rendered after the changes. Fix it if you break it -- or undo it -- or ask for help. |
80803418 | over 5 years ago | Rest is probably ok. |
80803418 | over 5 years ago | osm.org/way/471983747 -- probably not a square building -- doesn't match ESRI clarity |
80803418 | over 5 years ago | There's a bad drag of osm.org/way/496196928 -- don't think alll the nodes got moved -- original probably nearer ground truth, paralax in imagery. |
80803325 | over 5 years ago | Other changes look harmless / useful cleanup. |
80803325 | over 5 years ago | osm.org/way/625567210#map=19/51.46729/-2.57694 no longer matches ESRI clarity |
80803325 | over 5 years ago | osm.org/way/564470886#map=19/51.46989/-2.58089 no longer has a smooth wall/street |
80803325 | over 5 years ago | osm.org/way/668771054#map=19/51.46700/-2.58378 no longer has a smooth wall/street |
80803325 | over 5 years ago | osm.org/way/618601186#map=19/51.46612/-2.58457 no longer matches ESRI clarity |