OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
86234485 about 5 years ago

2018 Mapillary imagery near B4427 doesn't show any weight restrictions. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/85bG06565lLCyfWd3SnI8g

86252218 about 5 years ago

Looks like you've redrawn more recent stuff visible on Maxar near the Butchers Arms (roundabout).

86192741 about 5 years ago

Not sure it fits 800m of track any more? https://www.team-sport.co.uk/go-kart-tracks/

86181296 about 5 years ago

Please adjust the imagery offset before you start editing - hopefully it's ok now.

86121906 about 5 years ago

A normal bus can't drive on the guided busway sections - please remove "bus=designated".

86035457 about 5 years ago

Looks odd, no physical infrastructure for a shop on satellite imagery. Is it a popup?

85976854 about 5 years ago

I've added the building back as it's still visible on Maxar -- maybe just delete name/amenity tags when buildings are still present.

85909539 about 5 years ago

Brilliant -- couldn't see much of a path on satellite imagery (and it's always looked pretty green when I've walked past) -- there was a vague suspicion on GPX tracks.

I think the link was members-only?

85909967 about 5 years ago

Looks like it might connect to the service road from satellite imagery? If so, maybe just access=private inside the allotments?

85909747 about 5 years ago

It's already marked as a disused:amenity -- don't normally add "(Closed)" to names.

85909539 about 5 years ago

I hope you didn't copy this from the copyrighted website: https://ldwa.org.uk/ldp/members/show_path.p

85880626 about 5 years ago

Marked as "motor_vehilce=destination", there is a clear parked car at northern end (and no signage): https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=0e54796a-4eb6-49da-b2dd-0aefc1d91e1c&cp=51.530547~-2.475129&lvl=19&dir=239.35243&pi=-3.0015583&style=x&mo=z.2.34&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

85400748 about 5 years ago

Ok, I've taken off the "bicycle=no" tag

85434841 about 5 years ago

I disconnected a track going through a hedge.

85400627 about 5 years ago

Great!

85400748 about 5 years ago

You could map width, incline, surface even osm.wiki/Key:mtb:scale -- and hope cycle routing takes "notice" of it.

But osm.wiki/Key:access is really based on legal rights.

I'm surprised the bollard didn't affect it: osm.org/node/3777401730

85400627 about 5 years ago

Probably best to remove the description and mark it as "power=substation"?

85400748 about 5 years ago

OpenStreetMap doesn't map suitability.

The access specifiers are really for mapping legal restrictions - like whether there's a no cycling sign. A quick check with Bing Streetside doesn't seem to show any such signs - so I'm not sure this is totally valid?

85248356 about 5 years ago

I've connected the footpath to the road so that routing software will be able to use it.

85255807 about 5 years ago

Maxar Premium seems to show buildings being developed - do you agree?