OpenStreetMap
ndm's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 94552405 | over 4 years ago | The Aztec West edits look problematic - Cap Gemini is a not a man_made=works. |
| 93334974 | almost 5 years ago | This will be reverted -- it was surveyed carefully on foot -- there are several sections that aren't navigable by normal buses |
| 93281080 | almost 5 years ago | I've unglued the highway from the landuse. |
| 93080116 | almost 5 years ago | And looks like it restricts entry into the car parking for the park and ride, |
| 93080116 | almost 5 years ago | Was this surveyed -- it stops cars routing from Longmoor Way. |
| 92847006 | almost 5 years ago | The issue is that alltrails are interpreting a "track" (unpaved road) and drawing it so that it might be interpreted as a footpath -- this is not a fault of the underlying OpenStreetMap data. If you would like a map that shows footpaths better but also uses OSM data then maybe https://footpathmap.co.uk/map/?zoom=15&lng=-2.61478&lat=51.53869 would suit you better. |
| 92849567 | almost 5 years ago | Likewise. I didn’t get any contact when you redraw straight highway sections as curves that don’t entirely match reality, or normal editing conventions. Normally I just clean things up, but that wasn’t possible here. |
| 92847006 | almost 5 years ago | I don’t know the alltrails website - you should talk to them rather than deleting potentially useful info (even if it’s only useful for golfers). |
| 92849567 | almost 5 years ago | The road geometries were so badly edited in the change set - it was impossible to recover them back to their correct locations - so that they split at physical barriers - without spending an unnecessary amount of time. |
| 92847006 | almost 5 years ago | I've reverted this the tracks (not footpaths) clearly exist on Bing satellite imagery. It is of course possible that they need to be marked as "access=private" |
| 92759740 | almost 5 years ago | You're right -- was a lot easier to see the issue with the routing link. |
| 92759740 | almost 5 years ago | OsmAnd == Osm, using e.g. graph hopper router, etc. |
| 92759740 | almost 5 years ago | Can you please clarify what problem you are seeing. Post a link to a route on OsmAnd website that doesn’t work. I will check tonight. But at the moment it’s on the revert list. |
| 92759740 | almost 5 years ago | Just wrong will be reverted |
| 92716103 | almost 5 years ago | A more detailed changeset comment would be helpful for other local mappers. |
| 92715623 | almost 5 years ago | A more detailed changeset comment would be helpful for other local mappers. |
| 92714138 | almost 5 years ago | A more detailed changeset comment would be helpful for other local mappers. |
| 92714737 | almost 5 years ago | |
| 92716160 | almost 5 years ago | Changeset comment is bizarre -- presumably this needs reverting? |
| 92157005 | almost 5 years ago | There's no signed turn restriction on mapillary layer |