ndm's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
97788543 | over 4 years ago | |
97771310 | over 4 years ago | You need to adjust your imagery to match the current map rather than just drawing outside of the parking area. |
97775869 | over 4 years ago | It’s planned by the council but the responsible developer is not proposing to build it. Should be deleted. https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/incredibly-frustrating-delay-50m-bristol-4870185 |
97656990 | over 4 years ago | You're removing/changing stuff that was carefully surveyed on foot -- at least check on Mapillary before modifying things -- will revert items as necessary (again). |
97499758 | over 4 years ago | Ok, so you moved the info to a newer building that doesn't really have that name. If it's really obvious it isn't a typo, then just add a note -- don't just modify it -- let local mappers check. I'm only grumpy because this is the second time you've modified stuff without a survey that wasn't obviously wrong. |
97499758 | over 4 years ago | If you keep deleting information I will have to ask that you are blocked by the DWG. |
96969440 | over 4 years ago | https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=3c212b41-b017-454d-b918-b8d03eba7dcf&cp=51.448859~-2.584636&lvl=19&dir=51.95298&pi=2.8457613&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0.48&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 -- It used to hold the electric cable when Bristol had a tram system. |
97384292 | over 4 years ago | This deletion flagged up on my radar -- so I've added the two driveways as requested -- so that there's no information loss. |
97344415 | over 4 years ago | I've redrawn the service roads |
97344415 | over 4 years ago | You really ought to look at the existing map data before you start editing and align your imagery with existing data. |
97357708 | over 4 years ago | You have connected a highway to a landuse -- maybe you could use a filter when you edit next time -- I have redrawn it. |
97358503 | over 4 years ago | Your edits are ignoring the buildings already on the map (that were probably drawn with ESRI clarity) -- you really, really should adjust your imagery before you start to draw features using other imagery. |
96969440 | over 4 years ago | OpenStreetMap uses free form tags the wiki is purely for information you should not remove information that is valid, but not defined in the wiki. |
97297154 | over 4 years ago | Buildings are drawn carefully using ESRI clarity -- if they don't match the imagery you are using you need to apply an image offset. I have moved the service road to match the existing 100s of buildings. |
97323575 | over 4 years ago | Not a service road - two separate driveways to two separate garages. |
97224825 | over 4 years ago | I've added back the service road that you deleted - without re-adding the connection. |
97165878 | over 4 years ago | Really odd change - have a public service road surrounded by private service roads -- doesn't really make sense? |
97113048 | over 4 years ago | Putting bicycle=no means that even National Trust members aren't allowed to cycle to Tyntesfield -- which seems very strange and eco-unfriendly. |
97113048 | over 4 years ago | The public footpath is not permissive -- this changeset should be reverted -- see https://www.rowmaps.com/showmap.php?place=51.4417%2C-2.7101&map=OS&lat=51.441700&lon=2.7101&lonew=W |
96969440 | over 4 years ago | Ok, I've added this back. |