ndm's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
100286496 | over 4 years ago | What was changed? The comment's not very clear. |
99051053 | over 4 years ago | Only one short section is one way -- on Bing Streetside. |
98976962 | over 4 years ago | Remove restrictions - added oneway as visible on Bing Streetside. |
98998111 | over 4 years ago | Looks like the salon was added twice and some roads got dragged about a bit - will try to fix. |
98765931 | over 4 years ago | A more detailed changeset comment would be great - and help other local mappers. You seem to have added 4 new universities to Bristol which seems odd - and removed buidling tags from buildings which again seems odd. I'm going to tweak the name and add the building tags back. I'll try and find a better tagging mechanism on the OSM wiki, or maybe you can find one. |
98466991 | over 4 years ago | removed a footpath to avoid the mini-roundabout https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=f8d63762-95a8-496b-97b5-5b15c4a251cf&cp=51.507332~-2.630896&lvl=19&dir=260.5512&pi=-1.4445857&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 Other modifications seem ok. |
98470703 | over 4 years ago | 98470703 seems problematic in that motorists will have less/no time to turn due to the elongated road-marking influenced joins. Will revert back to the previous version that followed
|
98466310 | over 4 years ago | 98466310 - removes oneway (although markings suggest they should be oneway - in the same exit direction -- although Bing car seems to drive in?) https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=4f042376-e4ca-4694-a761-a708eb764658&cp=51.491744~-2.679992&lvl=19&dir=305.23654&pi=-24.748507&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 |
98466425 | over 4 years ago | Given that the inside lanes have no give way -- that would at least make this junction=circular? |
98466425 | over 4 years ago | There must be a way to map this without requiring entrance onto the roundabout. This is incorrect as this removes any way of avoiding the roundabout -- which is what the inside 2 lanes are for https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=ff2b1106-3af2-42d7-8f9d-a79a6b075137&cp=51.497792~-2.690791&lvl=19&dir=303.62515&pi=-22.17843&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 |
98466571 | over 4 years ago | I've unglued the political boundary from the service road. |
98467604 | over 4 years ago | This now seems to incorrectly allow a right turn from Rownham Hill to Bridge Road (see double white lines https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=0ebb4649-a299-4e13-8e13-a87d46e19b81&cp=51.451654~-2.636361&lvl=19&dir=265.55078&pi=-10.58628&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027). The crossings no longer have a highway tag. Turn restrictions related to the island don't seem to actually be signed. |
98467406 | over 4 years ago | I've added back the oneway that applies to most motor vehicles. |
98466040 | over 4 years ago | However, osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways says "If a road has a small traffic island (eg at the approach to a large roundabout) should this be represented as a triangle or not? How big should it be before it should be drawn? You can draw it or not, there is no limit below which it cannot be done, but the longer the separation is, the more likely someone will convert it into a dual carriageway and split the highway. Generally it is done." |
98466040 | over 4 years ago | It is possible that small gaps, e.g. < 1 typical car length might be mapped with a node -- provided that routing is not adversely affected. |
98466040 | over 4 years ago | I believe that in general the
|
98467063 | over 4 years ago | Fine. |
98466040 | over 4 years ago | I have already asked on talk-gb and was assured that whilst this may be viewed as micromapping it was still a valid approach. It would be great if you could consult the wiki -- in particular osm.wiki/Key:crossing:island which notes that there are tagging schemes that allow more detail, e.g. osm.wiki/Tag:footway%3Dcrossing and osm.wiki/Key:crossing Note: unfortunately the road connectivity no longer matches reality -- if disallows a number of valid turns between traffic calming islands. |
98300143 | over 4 years ago | Thanks for adding 4 semi-detached houses in Bristol - very hard to see that when the changeset is so large - always good to save each local edit before the next one. I'm going to tweak the Bristol houses slightly so that they share a joint wall and square them up -- there's usually a setting on editors to help with that. |
98220962 | over 4 years ago | The modifications look about 2-3 metres south -- I'll fix if I get time. |