Not sure that the "sidewalk=separate" is really true - sure you've drawn it as a separate way - but in reality there's nothing between the sidewalk and the road. You can cross anywhere. More detail's great but in this case it's likely to confuse pedestrian routers?

No worries - just spotted the no-entry except bikes on Mapillary.

Is this a recent change -- it's clearly two-way on Bing streetside https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=35581164-8d7e-4d7f-ac8c-c96a3fe92561&cp=51.46837~-2.613307&lvl=19&dir=44.859768&pi=-1.4095678&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

Ok, so this is correct -- no like the other times mapbox have editted this street.

This needs to be reverted - it's correct as is.

Redrawn slightly - service road was going through a pitch/playground.

Is this a new oneway -- can't see it on Bing streetside -- and Bing "satellite" imagery clearly shows cars facing both directions.

Probably needs reverting - rest of the "round road" is a roundabout.

I think the name tag is more of a description?

Redrawing - I think you've put the road through a building (on Bing).

May need to zoom in - but looks like a B5 on painted bus stop name https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.4565656700074&lng=-2.593537975946745&z=19.56796359863698&pKey=yobDg-fV_YoYj3hvRN_lgg&focus=photo&x=0.5077693495755636&y=0.526728348859028&zoom=0

Did you survey this stop osm.org/node/485403949

You've removed the (B5) from the name which is typically shown on timetimable information on Bristol bus stops. Note previous information was a specific survey of bus stop names, so I'm surprised it's changed.

Changeset comment seems odd?

Changeset comment seems odd?

It's 99% the wrong plaque/place -- it's nowhere near the "Chapel of the Three Kings" or "Foster's Almshouses" see osm.org/way/123978470

You’ve broken the no u turn restriction which is what is signed, so I’ll revert this.

If you could also please observe https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines that would be great -- at least then there's be an email address I can contact.

Bus stop names in Bristol don't necessarily match Naptan data - especially the old painted signs.

Even the Metro bus painted signs don't include the local_ref. although their paper timetables do seem to include it.

I don't want to have to revert changes where I've carefully surveyed names previously -- as it just upsets everyone.

As it happens I added one of the stops you modified -- but it was only recently built and it was probably dark/late, so I may have been mistaken on the name -- so I have simply added a note for the name to be double-checked. Normally, I would be passing by on a semi-regular basis - and could easily check - but that's not happening now.

So you’ve repainted the signage, or changed the electronic display, or changed the names on the paper timetables - and those match data in OpenStreetMap. If so, fantastic.

You’re misunderstanding OpenStreetMap - we map what’s on the ground and visible - not what’s in some database. Anyway I’ve added notes so that other mappers will check what’s present on the ground, I.e. ground truth.