OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
170753536 10 days ago

Hi, the building draw at 7-9 Wadham Parade is actually two separate houses

170701947 11 days ago

Hi, the two buildings addressed relations should be redone as simple polygons with out the join

170701905 11 days ago

Hi John, can you delete the name Buuilding from one of these.

170701782 11 days ago

Hi, the imagery appears out of date for address 492. If you check Esri imagery you will see two new buildings…units 1 & 2.
It is always best practice to check both Bing and Esri as Esri is often more recent.

170701956 11 days ago

Hi, there are two buildings at 316 and both are addressed as unit 1.
I expect that one should be unit 2

170697618 11 days ago

Hi, this polygon appears to only cover part of the building footprint.

170697542 11 days ago

Hi, could you check if osm.org/node/12419093565#map=19/-37.875809/145.133717 should be moved to the right where there is a building with no address. I think this node might have been accidentally shifted.

170679875 12 days ago

correction... the max and min age tags are correct

170677130 12 days ago

You have duplicated the same number under phone and mobile

170693371 12 days ago

You have duplicated the phone number with the same number under phone= and mobile=
Looks like a phone number.

170679875 12 days ago

Hi, you have duplicated the same phone number under the phone= and mobile=.
It looks like a phone number.
You have used min and a max age tags but both are the same age. This appears unlikely.

170506845 15 days ago

osm.org/way/975288222#map=16/-33.85097/151.28450

170506845 15 days ago

Hi, I reverted this because it is already mapped acurately

170485044 16 days ago

Hi, the Australian tagging guidelines
osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features
Shows the phone format should be
+61 7 1234 5678 or
+61 456 789 123 for mobiles
For 1800 numbers…
phone:AU=1800 123 456
The spaces are used for readability.
More on the wiki link

170318980 18 days ago

Thanks Lachlan

170318980 18 days ago

Hi, this grass multipolygon needs some attention. It looks to me that the grass does not surround the parking station so should be mapped as simple polygons instead.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.26963&lat=-37.84272&zoom=18

170184837 22 days ago

I reverted this edit

169751463 27 days ago

Well done. I’m unable to assist for now but it seems you have it all well in hand.

169751463 28 days ago

Hi, you are triggering quite a scene on osmi
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.01112&lat=-32.12087&zoom=17
Our wiki pages on multipolygon validity may be helpful
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

169662095 about 1 month ago

Hi, I reverted this as you need to place it at the physical location of your business instead near a city street and rail intersection.