OpenStreetMap
ohmanger's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by ohmanger
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3960489 | TheUKHighStreet | East went into administration in 2018 and all the shops were closed. |
|||
| 3741734 | ohmanger | Shouldn't the retail area (osm.org/relation/15992419) just be called 'Coleham' not 'Longden Coleham' which is the name of the historic road connecting Longden to Coleham. Also, just to be extra pedantic, does it even need a name tag when both Longden Coleham (the road) and Coleham (the suburb) are mapped? I'm aware the council has some cycle guideposts that say 'Longden Coleham' on them so maybe a moot point to make... |
|||
| 3928895 | Eliiia | As of now (early September 2023) Wilko is beginning to close via StreetComplete 54.0 |
|||
| 3928894 | Eliiia | "Dada Oriental Thai" moved to top floor and rebranded as exclusively a bubble tea shop via StreetComplete 54.0 |
|||
| 3971397 | ohmanger | Check use, looks like either haulage or factory of some sort |
|||
| 3882224 | Eliiia | cycleway ending here looks odd, where does the cycleway start/finish? |
|||
| 3967623 | ohmanger | Looks like possible footpath on bing imagery |
|||
| 3715546 | Eliiia | I am not sure why, but the cycle path here seems to render differently on both cyclosm and the standard view. This should probably be made to be more consistent. |
|||
| 3932209 | ohmanger | Needs survey of retail units |
|||
| 1349975 | trigpoint | Check prow status |