Is osm.org/relation/6453103 a new sign? I haven't been out to UBC in a couple months, but I'm pretty sure going along W 41st, SW Marine, and then Camosun was allowed.

There's been some discussion about this data in osm.org/note/677611 - could you add a comment over there?

You've uploaded a bunch of nodes but there doesn't seem to be a way here

When something is closed or demolished, it's best to delete it.

Is there a greengrocer inside the costco, or is it just the costco produce section?

Wikipedia has the Chinese name for Tower Bridge as 倫敦塔橋, is that a better name to use?

If a path isn't accessible to the public it should still be mapped and not deleted. Access can be indicated with the access=no tag

Hello,

Imports in OpenStreetMap need to meet a number of requirements which include discussing them with the community (talk-ca@ and imports@ list) before they're done.

It doesn't seem like that was done here

If you want to make a big change like this, please discuss it on talk-ca@ to build consensus for the idea

This looks like a residential home. Is there an office or something here?

Hello,

you seem to be doing a mechanical edit of some kind. In OSM mechanical edits need to be documented and you need to consult with the community first. Was this done here?

You've placed this shop in the middle of a parking lot - is it in one of the nearby buildings, or has the area been redeveloped?

Also, it's best to avoid marketing text in descriptions and changeset comments

Hi,

could you please use good changeset comments (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments) instead of comments like "1"

You're still using similar changeset comments

Are you sure osm.org/way/37298472 flows north? That seems to be uphill and inconsistent with everything else in the area.

The Surf_Type and Trail_Name tags are odd, were they from an import?

Is it a grass area, or a meadow? Meadows have an assortment of plants and aren't as suited for walking across as grass

Is WA56 an IATA code? I thought they were all 3 letters maximum

Hi,
Imports in OpenStreetMap need to meet a number of requirements which include discussing them with the community (talk-ca@ and imports@ list) before they're done.

It doesn't seem like that was done here

The primary roads in the south seem wrong - they are not major highways linking large towns. Could you change them to a more appropriate road classification?