raito's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
51553347 | almost 8 years ago | Is it because it doesn't look good as a mini_roundabout? Need further explanation, otherwise might as well make mini_roundabouts obsolete on OSM. |
51095817 | about 8 years ago | Hi. I think it IS a road. Maybe not a residential road, but still a road. Or at least, was a road, maybe it is closed now. |
51189522 | about 8 years ago | I did some photo mapping around this intersection earlier this year (uploaded to Mapillary), and you can see barriers there. There are gaps between the barriers, so it is still physically possible to do any turns. |
51047240 | about 8 years ago | Hi. What is a "living street" in Brunei? I don't see Brunei's definition of it in osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street Can't we just use highway=service or highway=residential? |
51021366 | about 8 years ago | Hi! You are making roads on top of existing roads. Maybe you wanted to create routes instead. Please take your time to understand how to map them and other objects you plan to map at wiki.openstreetmap.org. |
50782727 | about 8 years ago | Sorry.. I meant layer=1. Level tag is for buildings. |
50782727 | about 8 years ago | Hi. I think there should not need to make the water area below bridges (like Jambatan Residency here) as inner of the water relation. The river is still there. You can just make the bridge level=1. Software may also think logically when water or waterway overlaps a road, the road should be 1 level above it. Anyways, thanks for your great work. Cheers! |
50647083 | about 8 years ago | Hi. I noticed you make many relations with only 1 way as member. You should just put the tags in that 1 way to avoid complicated structure.. cheers |
50588461 | about 8 years ago | source=digitalglobe
|
50558237 | about 8 years ago | |
50101691 | about 8 years ago | Speaking about real data, what is the source of your data? I hope you're not copying from Google Map or other maps. Or is it from a government department? I don't think we can use that here either, unless you got permission. |
50101691 | about 8 years ago | Hi. Please don't delete those traffic_sign=city_limit nodes. Those are real data everyone can see on the road. You don't have to do anything because I have restored them: osm.org/changeset/50121457 |
48640807 | over 8 years ago | source= survey;mapillary;digitalglobe |
48132046 | over 8 years ago | Hi. From where do you get data for this hill? Cheers |
44150036 | over 8 years ago | correct description:
|
40443171 | about 9 years ago | Hi, what's up?? |
40443171 | about 9 years ago | Hi. I undeleted most of the woods you deleted (changeset #40451116). Please don't delete them again, unless you have a good explanation why they should not be there. Cheers! |
39593889 | over 9 years ago | Correct description:
|
38119621 | over 9 years ago | Description MISTAKE. Correct description: "woods tracing." |
37224749 | over 9 years ago | Nice work! |