Thanks!

Many thanks for doing this. I had meant to update the relevant roads on 2020-07-31 when The City of Westminster (20 mph Speed Limit) (No. 1) Traffic Order 2020 came into force.

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3603477

You have mapped this as landuse=military, however I am reasonably sure that the Environment Agency is not part of the MoD. You could tag the perimeter fence/wall as barrier=* together with landuse=industrial.

This looks a little like tagging for the renderer, see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Hi Mike,

453 appears to be CRT's bridge reference, so I've moved it to bridge:ref. S115 appears to be a Lea Valley Regional Park ref (presumably for the bridge structure), which I have left in the ref tag.

It's very unlikely to be a PROW ref, as this is a recently reopened permissive path which was well maintained, but fenced off until late spring this year, for no apparent reason. London Legacy Development Corporation don't really do transparency, so whether it is officially open even now is anyone's guess.

Footbridge updated in
osm.org/changeset/88842488

Waterden Road bridge(s) also changed from ref->bridge:ref in
osm.org/changeset/88842618

Waterden Road, not Carpenters Road.

Thanks! I'm still perplexed as to how I managed to select nodes so far off-screen from where I was editing. I should probably restart JOSM and reload a more localised area of the map more often.

PLease accept my apologies for this. It's very odd, I wasn't trying to edit anything around Startford town centre and I have no idea quite how I managed to do it. I think the best thing for me to do here would be for me to fully revert 88181456, 88094856 and 88094856 to ensure that your 3D edits are restored to their original condition, then I'll try to restore my QEOP edits from a saved .osm file.

It's another one of Tommyf5's dubious "suburbs". I fear there will be quite a lot to clean up, again.

You have removed the footway=sidewalk tag, despite the fact that these footways clearly are sidewalks. Being a sidewalk does not imply anything about access, so your changeset comment is irrelevant, but it does confirm that the bicycle=yes tag you used in changeset #86996451 was incorrect.

Please read the wiki before changing tags.
osm.wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/87221329

Wikipedia and wikidata tags should refer to the actual OSM object, not to the type of object. Generic wiki* tags will be removed/reverted.

Please don't delete features which other users have mapped, tag them with service=driveway + access=private (or access=customers) instead, which will prevent routers from sending the public along those routes.
osm.wiki/Key:access

Closure ETO coming into force 2020-06-11, also Gore Road/Lauriston Road and Ufton Road/Downham Road.
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3572683

Left turn from Bucknall Street into Shaftesbury Avenue prohibited from 2020-06-08 by THE CAMDEN (PRESCRIBED ROUTES) (NO. 5) TRAFFIC ORDER 2020
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3571440

In that case, I shall update the park with one changeset per excluded area and leave the LLDC boundary unchanged.

That statement could perhaps be considered a little controversial. Which guidelines are you referring to? osm.wiki/Cycling_in_the_United_Kingdom does not appear to state that either style is preferred, let alone that highway=cycleway is deprecated for shared use with pedestrians.

That said, changing one style to the other against established local mapping convention is unhelpful, but perhaps this is one of the iD editor's suggested "improvements"?

AIUI, cycleways and other highways in the UK do not require explicit permission for pedestrian use, but rather require explicit prohibition where pedestrians are not alloweed e.g. with the traffic sign in TSGRD diagram 625.1.

Also, foot=permissive means that the way is open to [pedestrians] until such time as the owner revokes the permission which they are legally allowed to do at any time in the future. That may be the case on private property, but then bicycle=permissive would probably also apply.

I've asked another active local mapper his opinion, but will go ahead and change it unless he can think of any potential problems with it.

I wonder if it would also be worth altering the outer boundary to remove the aggregates site (Bow East?) where the 2012 warm-up facilities were, as this was never really part of QEOP.

Also sites like UCL East, East Bank, Sweetwater and Bobby Moore Academy might perhaps be excluded from the leisure=park multipolygon as inner relations.

Thanks, I haven't had a chance to check/add these and resolve my notes. The experimental traffic order is here
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3563490

Missing source URL
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3558345

It's only as the surface dressing has worn down that it's become obvious that it's asphalt, rather than a well-maintained compacted surface.

The term pea grit/pea shingle was something which caught out a friend and I at Peacehaven parkrun last summer. That term in the course description led us to wear trail running shoes, which are less than comfortable on asphalt or concrete.