Thanks! You've just filled in some of the blanks from my edits adding footways/sidewalks to The Highway.

Now for the long wait for them to work properly on Komoot...

Removed in osm.org/changeset/108941585

I meant to remove it entirely from the cycleways. Although it describes the relation of the segregated/separate footway, it's not much use when not documented as such and is consequently flagged by QA tools.

That was quick, thanks! I was going to do it after breakfast tomorrow :-)

Fully reverted in osm.org/changeset/107721817

Thanks. I've added the heritage tags from NHLE in changeset #107692732

The parkrun course in the route relation is quite different from the one I ran in 2019 and the parkrun website. Is this a new course from 2020?

@cjmalone In this case, yes, along with "not:junction=roundabout" to make it absolutely clear that it's just a circular section of a residential street with no special status whatsoever. Neither tag should be necessary, but in a previous edit the road geometry was deleted and replaced by a junction=mini_roundabout node (and a fixme stating that it wasn't a mini-roundabout).

You're doing some fantastic mapping in previously neglected parts of Newham, for which I am very grateful.

However in this case, you haven't "corrected" the circular section of Queensberry Place, you have added what is essentially fiction. When I tagged it with "not:junction=roundabout", I did so for a reason.

If you read the wiki page for the junction=roundabout tag, you may note that the following is in bold: "The tag junction=roundabout is used only on road intersections where traffic on the roundabout has right of way."
osm.wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout

There are no TSRGD Diagram 1003.3 give way markings here, therefore it is not a roundabout for traffic law purposes and traffic on the circular section of road does not have priority.

The oneway=yes tag would be redundant on a real roundabout and requires explicit signage to have effect elsewhere, e.g. TSRGD Diagram 606, the blue circular one way arrow. I am not aware that any such sign exists at this location.

Chapter 6 of the Traffic Signs Manual may be of some assistance in understanding what is, and is not, a roundabout.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/773421/traffic-signs-manual-chapter-05.pdf

I also note that you realigned the roundabout from cadastral to Bing's default offset.

Updated in osm.org/changeset/107201333

No problem. I've reverted the deletion and marked as disused. Hopefully it can be permanently deleted later in the year, perhaps when ExCeL returns to hosting exhibitions as normal?

osm.org/node/7326515224

True, but unless you can be certain that all modifications have been removed it might have been better to use the disused:* lifecycle prefix rather than deleting the POI and its history.

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Thanks. I meant to resolve that one when I got home, but forgot about it.

Partly correct re: Queensberry Place, it's not a mini-roundabout (not sure why you tagged it as one, with a fixme saying it wasn't, or deleted the previous layout). It isn't a roundabout either, in the legal sense, just a circular section of road.

Updated in osm.org/changeset/106554110

For the buildings between Wellington Road and Didsbury/Melbourne Road, there is already a surrounding landuse=residential area. They still need a building=* tag, e.g. building=apartments

Thanks, I'll update to the correct landuse=religious.

Thanks. I expect they'll remain in use if the Bow East concrete plant plans go ahead.
Updated in osm.org/changeset/106451570

osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreligious

Thanks for updating this.

You could always use landuse=religion for the area surrounding a church (ideally matching the Land Registry boundaries, where available).

A lot of the landuse polygons in this area are quite old and take a very broad brush approach.

The railway tracks between Bow East and the canal appear to be in use again - there was a freight train there when I cycled along the Greenway this afternoon. Are there any reasons I shouldn't reverse the disused status?

Thanks. The whole building had previously been tagged as leisure=swimming_pool.