rskedgell's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
164130426 | 5 months ago | Already mapped correctly as osm.org/relation/13401608 The grass infield isn't a running track. I remember it quite distinctly from the last time I ran there. |
164130501 | 5 months ago | Already mapped as osm.org/relation/2723886 |
164130604 | 5 months ago | Already mapped as osm.org/relation/2725261 (although neither the inner member of the relation nor your duplicate accurately separate the 400m inner boundary of the running track from the jumps area) |
164130924 | 5 months ago | Already mapped as osm.org/relation/1634345 (although it has an unusual value for the surface tag) |
164130995 | 5 months ago | Already mapped as osm.org/relation/2893803 |
164131400 | 5 months ago | Why did you delete the polygons incorrectly tagged as traffic_calming=island, instead of tagging them correctly as area:highway=traffic_island ? The landuse=grass area you created should have shared the geometry of the Eastern traffic island you deleted, not been glued to the bounding highway lines. Fixed in osm.org/changeset/164169329 |
164132242 | 5 months ago | Already mapped as osm.org/relation/2570527 |
164132411 | 5 months ago | The running track is already mapped correctly as an area, in this case a multipolygon ( osm.org/relation/2534285 ). You don't need to duplicate the multipolygon's tags, or a subset of them, on the inner or outer members of the multipolygon. Please ensure that you have read and understood the following before you edit any more athletics tracks. osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon
If you could explain what you are trying to do and why, I will try to help you. Most facilities for track and field in the UK could do with being mapped more accurately. |
108389391 | 5 months ago | Looking at your fixme tags and Bing's street side imagery for the junction of Albion Road and Broadway, I think it's just a T-junction with confusing paving. It's not a mini-roundabout despite the traversable centre, as the centre isn't marked with TSRGD diagram 1003.4 (no arrows around it, not reflectorised). The approaches also lack the diagram 611.1 blue mini roundabout upright signs. It's not a roundabout either, as there aren't any give way markings on the approach and no right of way to traffic on the junction. |
164143951 | 5 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. In order to add your business, you need to add a new point where it is actually relocated, together with a tag like office=taxi to tell data consumers what sort of thing you are. You probably also want to add tags like website and contact:phone. See osm.wiki/ for details of how these tags work. You cannot simply rename a residential building to that of your business and change its address. That change was reverted. If you need any help, please feel free to ask. |
164148210 | 5 months ago | Your business is already mapped (with your tagging errors fixed) as osm.org/node/12702338567 Are there two of you/your business? |
164122555 | 5 months ago | Le propriétaire ne préférerait-il pas que vous utilisiez les balises addr:*, et ce, correctement ? L'insertion de l'adresse dans contact:* est utile lorsque l'adresse de correspondance diffère de l'adresse postale, ce qui ne semble pas être le cas ici. |
164121056 | 5 months ago | I've removed the duplicate, corrected the address tags and moved the POI from no. 20 to 22. I have also added craft=atelier, as there was no top-level tag to tell data consumers what sort of POI this is. Another value may be more appropriate, see osm.wiki/Tag%3Acraft%3Datelier |
164112758 | 5 months ago | The dragged node was fixed in osm.org/changeset/164114127 |
164105485 | 5 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please could you use a meaningful changeset comment, as "added a node" conveys no useful information whatsoever about what you were trying to achieve. |
164107149 | 5 months ago | You may also want to replace addr:housenumber=Winsor & Newton Building, Suite 18 with addr:unit=Suite 18
|
164105535 | 5 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please could you use a meaningful changeset comment, as "#modified Geometry" conveys no useful information whatsoever about what you were trying to achieve. |
164105532 | 5 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please could you use a meaningful changeset comment, as "#modified Geometry" conveys no useful information whatsoever about what you were trying to achieve. |
164105527 | 5 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please could you use a meaningful changeset comment, as "#modified geometry" conveys no useful information whatsoever about what you were trying to achieve. |
164105519 | 5 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please could you use a meaningful changeset comment, as "#Modified Geometry" conveys no useful information whatsoever about what you were trying to achieve. |