Thanks, that's indeed a better way to tag this situation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168653991

Nadeel nu is wel dat deze nieuwe outer losgekoppeld is van osm.org/way/110008807

Adding hammock and benches, public_bookcase

Dit ziet er allemaal correct uit.

I must have made a mistake. The area around the house is residential area (it's not an active farm). The farmland is indeed farmland. I will correct my mistake now. Thanks for getting in touch.

Hello,
In this changeset, you have changed the streetname from Hobelaan to Georges Hobélaan. There seems to be some confusion as to what is correct. What is your source on this? In the changeset, you mention "AIV Flanders most recent aerial imagery" as a source. But it's unlikely you saw the streetname from aerial images :) Thanks for getting back and helping to clear this up.

"shown on the map", on what map exactly do you mean? Some applications aimed towards hikers already do effort to clearly indicate (or hide) forbidden paths.

Secondly, I highly doubt that a large amount of people using those paths on Walberla do so because the default map on osm.org shows them. On the contrary: people mainly use those paths because the paths are there, and because people ignore the signs.

See more arguments at:
osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
"OSM is a map of what is, not what ought to be"