OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
60831702 about 7 years ago

Hi, peregrination! I'm not an expert on reversion, but I've undeleted most of the ways using Potlatch1, and undeleted the node for the Spring River pub/carvery using the Level0 editor. I wasn't sure about way 16582066, so I didn't undelete that.

60831702 about 7 years ago

Hi. You seem to have deleted a number of objects that I had mapped. Was that an accident?

Steve

60435425 about 7 years ago

Hmm. We now have:

name=Carrefour
name:el=Σκλαβενίτης
name:en=Σκλαβενίτης

That doesn't seem entirely to make sense!

58343273 over 7 years ago

Fake park created by Pokémon Go user?

58343247 over 7 years ago

Judging by the aerial imagery, it seems unlikely that there is a park in this location. If you're trying to manipulate Pokémon Go by adding non-existent features to OSM, please don't.

56793256 over 7 years ago

overl = overall

56793256 over 7 years ago

Wow! Super detailed changeset. Not sure about a couple of things though...

Deletion of way 184967801: looks like this was intended to connect the centre-line of the canal to the centre-line of the river, which I imagine would be useful to navigation software.

The multiple leisure=park objects within the overl park (way 235961173) known as Gordon Promenade. I guess these are individual grassed areas separated by paths. I don't think it's normal to make each one a separate park. Perhaps make these landcover=grass?

54968622 over 7 years ago

I don't think leisure=park is an appropriate tag for a business park. landuse=commercial is probably better.

If your choice of leisure=park was an attempt to influence the game of Pokémon Go, then please don't. Using inaccurate tags degrades the map for everyone else.

42242730 over 7 years ago

I don't think speed limits should be put into the name tag of railway lines - was this a typo?

51343006 almost 8 years ago

Glad to be of service! However, I think you have now accidentally overwritten 'sport' with 'fix typo', presumably intended as a changeset comment.

Steve

51343006 almost 8 years ago

Should node 528921324 be leisure=pitch?

50834186 almost 8 years ago

J H Baldwin, I hope you won't be put off editing by my comment above. Maybe I was a bit curt - sorry!

50888404 almost 8 years ago

I wonder if it would be better to transfer your tags to the already-mapped building?

Also, I think there is a preference in the UK for 'St' rather than 'Saint', but I guess that's a matter of personal preference.

50834186 almost 8 years ago

OK, so you didn't like my idea of retaining the node (with its useful address information) and modifying the tea-room-related tags to effectively 'comment them out'?

48371956 about 8 years ago

Is it really spelt 'Pavillion'?

47591827 over 8 years ago

Isn't this a duplicate of osm.org/way/454663889 ?

45364788 over 8 years ago

'Incorrect data' is a bit vague. Wouldn't it be more useful to explain what you think is wrong with the edits?

44605137 over 8 years ago

OK, it's just that the boundary seems to cut through several property boundaries (and even through some houses). Maybe it's just an approximate boundary?

44605137 over 8 years ago

Is this 'garden park' a real-world thing, or just something you made up?

43845582 over 8 years ago

Oops! Copy-paste error on my part. Thanks for fixing.