sdoerr's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
60831702 | about 7 years ago | Hi, peregrination! I'm not an expert on reversion, but I've undeleted most of the ways using Potlatch1, and undeleted the node for the Spring River pub/carvery using the Level0 editor. I wasn't sure about way 16582066, so I didn't undelete that. |
60831702 | about 7 years ago | Hi. You seem to have deleted a number of objects that I had mapped. Was that an accident? Steve |
60435425 | about 7 years ago | Hmm. We now have: name=Carrefour
That doesn't seem entirely to make sense! |
58343273 | over 7 years ago | Fake park created by Pokémon Go user? |
58343247 | over 7 years ago | Judging by the aerial imagery, it seems unlikely that there is a park in this location. If you're trying to manipulate Pokémon Go by adding non-existent features to OSM, please don't. |
56793256 | over 7 years ago | overl = overall |
56793256 | over 7 years ago | Wow! Super detailed changeset. Not sure about a couple of things though... Deletion of way 184967801: looks like this was intended to connect the centre-line of the canal to the centre-line of the river, which I imagine would be useful to navigation software. The multiple leisure=park objects within the overl park (way 235961173) known as Gordon Promenade. I guess these are individual grassed areas separated by paths. I don't think it's normal to make each one a separate park. Perhaps make these landcover=grass? |
54968622 | over 7 years ago | I don't think leisure=park is an appropriate tag for a business park. landuse=commercial is probably better. If your choice of leisure=park was an attempt to influence the game of Pokémon Go, then please don't. Using inaccurate tags degrades the map for everyone else. |
42242730 | over 7 years ago | I don't think speed limits should be put into the name tag of railway lines - was this a typo? |
51343006 | almost 8 years ago | Glad to be of service! However, I think you have now accidentally overwritten 'sport' with 'fix typo', presumably intended as a changeset comment. Steve |
51343006 | almost 8 years ago | Should node 528921324 be leisure=pitch? |
50834186 | almost 8 years ago | J H Baldwin, I hope you won't be put off editing by my comment above. Maybe I was a bit curt - sorry! |
50888404 | almost 8 years ago | I wonder if it would be better to transfer your tags to the already-mapped building? Also, I think there is a preference in the UK for 'St' rather than 'Saint', but I guess that's a matter of personal preference. |
50834186 | almost 8 years ago | OK, so you didn't like my idea of retaining the node (with its useful address information) and modifying the tea-room-related tags to effectively 'comment them out'? |
48371956 | about 8 years ago | Is it really spelt 'Pavillion'? |
47591827 | over 8 years ago | Isn't this a duplicate of osm.org/way/454663889 ? |
45364788 | over 8 years ago | 'Incorrect data' is a bit vague. Wouldn't it be more useful to explain what you think is wrong with the edits? |
44605137 | over 8 years ago | OK, it's just that the boundary seems to cut through several property boundaries (and even through some houses). Maybe it's just an approximate boundary? |
44605137 | over 8 years ago | Is this 'garden park' a real-world thing, or just something you made up? |
43845582 | over 8 years ago | Oops! Copy-paste error on my part. Thanks for fixing. |