How ‘open’ is ‘government open data for postcodes’? I’m still not sure if we’re safe to derive anything from OS Codepoint Open :-(

– Steve

Report a bug here: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&component=nominatim&order=priority?

OK, Google now has the new alignment (but not the name - perhaps I should check that).

Presumably a compass works underground, so if you could get a continuous log of speed (or distance travelled) and compass bearing, you could do a bit of 'dead reckoning'. Perhaps you could take a compass with you, set it up next to your speedometer in the cab, and video the two as you drive? Or maybe you need to get one of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_navigation_system

Do the tunnels have ventilation shafts to the surface that could act as further checkpoints?

'The sources for all these changes are a) printed maps and town maps [...]'

NO, NO, NO!!

Well, unless German copyright law is different from most other people's.

It's a bit of a fiddle, but a convention has arisen of coding highway=no in cases such as this.

It's a bit of a fiddle, but a convention has arisen of coding highway=no in cases such as this.

To what end?

Have you changed your mind and accepted the CTs?

--
Steve

El Talar de Pacheco seems to be a gated community ('barrio cerrado') in the General Pacheco district: properties for sale on this web page: http://propiedades.zonaprop.com.ar/venta-bsas-gba-zona-norte-tigre-el-talar-de-pacheco/opZtipo-operacion-venta_lnZ13009

--
Steve

Not the Immaculate Conception, I suppose? osm.org/?lat=14.470486&lon=120.992623&zoom=18&layers=M

That place has way too many churches!

--
Steve

I think I found it: osm.org/?lat=14.426247&lon=120.998935&zoom=18&layers=M

Message sent.

Thanks, Sanderd17. The Mapquest site looks good, but the final bit looks more difficult - getting the locations into the satnav (the other site gives me the co-ordinates for each one).